UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2014 |
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from _______ to _______ |
Commission File Number 1-14643
____________________________________________________
STERIS Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
____________________________________________________
Ohio | 34-1482024 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) | |
5960 Heisley Road, Mentor, Ohio | 44060-1834 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) | |
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
____________________________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer x | Accelerated Filer o | |
Non-Accelerated Filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller Reporting Company o | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
The number of common shares outstanding as of January 30, 2015: 59,574,771
1
STERIS Corporation and Subsidiaries
Form 10-Q
Index
Page | ||
2
PART I— FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
STERIS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
December 31, 2014 | March 31, 2014 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 144,512 | $ | 152,802 | ||||
Accounts receivable (net of allowances of $9,011 and $10,922, respectively) | 297,015 | 313,686 | ||||||
Inventories, net | 183,456 | 155,146 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net | 15,477 | 16,084 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 31,091 | 37,027 | ||||||
Total current assets | 671,551 | 674,745 | ||||||
Property, plant, and equipment, net | 475,485 | 454,410 | ||||||
Goodwill and intangibles, net | 861,438 | 747,715 | ||||||
Other assets | 19,334 | 10,292 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 2,027,808 | $ | 1,887,162 | ||||
Liabilities and equity | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 78,942 | $ | 102,430 | ||||
Accrued payroll and other related liabilities | 67,989 | 58,774 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other | 97,510 | 93,302 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 244,441 | 254,506 | ||||||
Long-term indebtedness | 610,680 | 493,480 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net | 59,737 | 59,053 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 36,852 | 38,877 | ||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 951,710 | $ | 845,916 | ||||
Commitments and contingencies (see note 9) | ||||||||
Serial preferred shares, without par value; 3,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding | — | — | ||||||
Common shares, without par value; 300,000 shares authorized; 70,040 shares issued; 59,561 and 58,968 shares outstanding, respectively | 257,760 | 246,186 | ||||||
Common shares held in treasury, 10,479 and 11,072 shares, respectively | (317,520 | ) | (324,202 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings | 1,166,116 | 1,112,240 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | (32,191 | ) | 4,481 | |||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 1,074,165 | 1,038,705 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest | 1,933 | 2,541 | ||||||
Total equity | 1,076,098 | 1,041,246 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 2,027,808 | $ | 1,887,162 | ||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
STERIS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended December 31, | Nine Months Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Product | $ | 267,285 | $ | 252,616 | $ | 754,570 | $ | 710,853 | ||||||||
Service | 205,959 | 152,935 | 594,046 | 446,112 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues | 473,244 | 405,551 | 1,348,616 | 1,156,965 | ||||||||||||
Cost of revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Product | 150,164 | 144,884 | 423,130 | 408,051 | ||||||||||||
Service | 125,924 | 96,892 | 364,245 | 283,787 | ||||||||||||
Total cost of revenues | 276,088 | 241,776 | 787,375 | 691,838 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit | 197,156 | 163,775 | 561,241 | 465,127 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative | 122,370 | 95,497 | 362,350 | 280,087 | ||||||||||||
Research and development | 14,549 | 11,580 | 39,964 | 36,960 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring expenses | (1,109 | ) | 808 | (10 | ) | 878 | ||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 135,810 | 107,885 | 402,304 | 317,925 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations | 61,346 | 55,890 | 158,937 | 147,202 | ||||||||||||
Non-operating expenses, net: | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 4,822 | 4,672 | 14,452 | 14,527 | ||||||||||||
Interest income and miscellaneous expense | (417 | ) | (241 | ) | (673 | ) | (715 | ) | ||||||||
Total non-operating expenses, net | 4,405 | 4,431 | 13,779 | 13,812 | ||||||||||||
Income before income tax expense | 56,941 | 51,459 | 145,158 | 133,390 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense | 18,817 | 22,953 | 51,493 | 42,824 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 38,124 | $ | 28,506 | $ | 93,665 | $ | 90,566 | ||||||||
Net income per common share | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.48 | $ | 1.58 | $ | 1.54 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.63 | $ | 0.48 | $ | 1.56 | $ | 1.52 | ||||||||
Cash dividends declared per common share outstanding | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.67 | $ | 0.61 | ||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
STERIS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended December 31, | Nine Months Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||
Net income | 38,124 | 28,506 | 93,665 | 90,566 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized (loss) gain on available for sale securities, net of taxes of $172, $0, $172, $0, respectively | (569 | ) | 157 | (510 | ) | 252 | ||||||||||
Amortization of pension and postretirement benefit plans costs, net of taxes of $137, $89, $412 and $267, respectively | (222 | ) | (140 | ) | (665 | ) | (419 | ) | ||||||||
Change in cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment | (18,806 | ) | 945 | (35,497 | ) | 8,244 | ||||||||||
Total other comprehensive (loss) income | (19,597 | ) | 962 | (36,672 | ) | 8,077 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 18,527 | $ | 29,468 | $ | 56,993 | $ | 98,643 | ||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
STERIS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2014 | 2013 | |||||||
Operating activities: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 93,665 | $ | 90,566 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization | 69,440 | 55,689 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 344 | 4,019 | ||||||
Share-based compensation expense | 11,409 | 8,930 | ||||||
Loss (gain) on the disposal of property, plant, equipment, and intangibles, net | (400 | ) | 1,795 | |||||
Other items | (5,392 | ) | 1,331 | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable, net | 29,192 | 9,859 | ||||||
Inventories, net | (27,014 | ) | (14,431 | ) | ||||
Other current assets | 6,287 | 12,040 | ||||||
Accounts payable | (25,215 | ) | 1,233 | |||||
Tax benefit from share-based compensation | (8,880 | ) | (1,864 | ) | ||||
Accruals and other, net | 21,774 | (26,994 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 165,210 | 142,173 | ||||||
Investing activities: | ||||||||
Purchases of property, plant, equipment, and intangibles, net | (56,757 | ) | (64,778 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant, equipment, and intangibles | 812 | 4,739 | ||||||
Purchases of investments | (4,681 | ) | — | |||||
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired | (182,692 | ) | (8,443 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (243,318 | ) | (68,482 | ) | ||||
Financing activities: | ||||||||
Payments on long-term obligations | — | (70,000 | ) | |||||
Deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs | (7,347 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||
Proceeds under credit facilities, net | 117,200 | 52,450 | ||||||
Repurchases of common shares | (20,110 | ) | (23,236 | ) | ||||
Cash dividends paid to common shareholders | (39,790 | ) | (36,009 | ) | ||||
Stock option and other equity transactions, net | 19,245 | 11,877 | ||||||
Tax benefit from share-based compensation | 8,880 | 1,864 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 78,078 | (63,097 | ) | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (8,260 | ) | 4,735 | |||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (8,290 | ) | 15,329 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 152,802 | 142,008 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 144,512 | $ | 157,337 | ||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
STERIS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
For the Three and Nine Months Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
1. Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations
STERIS Corporation, an Ohio corporation, develops, manufactures and markets infection prevention, contamination control, microbial reduction, and surgical and gastrointestinal support products and services for healthcare, pharmaceutical, scientific, research, industrial, and governmental Customers throughout the world. As used in this Quarterly Report, STERIS Corporation and its subsidiaries together are called “STERIS,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our,” unless otherwise noted.
We operate in three reportable business segments: Healthcare, Life Sciences, and STERIS Isomedix Services (“Isomedix”). We describe our business segments in note 10 to our consolidated financial statements titled, “Business Segment Information.” Our fiscal year ends on March 31. References in this Quarterly Report to a particular “year” or “year-end” mean our fiscal year. The significant accounting policies applied in preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company are summarized below:
Interim Financial Statements
We prepared the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company according to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and the instructions to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. This means that they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. Our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements contain all material adjustments (including normal recurring accruals and adjustments) management believes are necessary to fairly state our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented.
These interim consolidated financial statements should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2014 dated May 29, 2014. The Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2014 was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at March 31, 2014, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.
Principles of Consolidation
We use the consolidation method to report our investment in our subsidiaries. Therefore, the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. We eliminate inter-company accounts and transactions when we consolidate these accounts. Income attributable to non-controlling interests is reported in the "Interest income and miscellaneous expense" line of our Consolidated Statements of Income and is not material.
Use of Estimates
We make certain estimates and assumptions when preparing financial statements according to U.S. GAAP that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the financial statement dates and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. These estimates and assumptions involve judgments with respect to many factors that are difficult to predict and are beyond our control. Actual results could be materially different from these estimates. We revise the estimates and assumptions as new information becomes available. This means that operating results for the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for future quarters or for the full fiscal year ending March 31, 2015.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the FASB issued the Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09 titled "Revenue from Contracts with Customers", superseding Accounting Standards Codification ASC Topic 605, "Revenue Recognition" and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. This amended guidance states that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration
7
STERIS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)—(Continued)
For the Three and Nine Months Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
(dollars in thousands)
to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance further states in order to achieve that core principle an entity should apply a series of five steps which include: identify the contract(s) with the Customer, identify the performance obligations in the contract, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price to the performance obligation in the contract, and recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. Entities are given the option to apply either a full retrospective with practical expedients or a modified retrospective transition method. ASU 2014-09 will also require additional disclosures in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. The standard update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within that period, early adoption is not permitted. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact that the standard will have on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
A detailed description of our significant and critical accounting policies, estimates, and assumptions is included in our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2014 dated May 29, 2014. Our significant and critical accounting policies, estimates, and assumptions have not changed materially from March 31, 2014.
2. Restructuring
Fiscal 2014 Restructuring Plan. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we adopted and announced a targeted restructuring plan primarily focused on the closure of our Hopkins manufacturing facility located in Mentor, Ohio (the “Fiscal 2014 Restructuring Plan”). As a result of this plan, we will transfer operations located at Hopkins to other North American locations. We believe that by closing the operations at Hopkins we will more effectively utilize our existing North American manufacturing network while reducing operating costs.
Since the inception of the Restructuring Plan we have incurred pre-tax expenses totaling $19,804 related to these actions, of which $12,077 was recorded as restructuring expenses and $7,727 was recorded in cost of revenues, with restructuring expenses of $17,721, $767, and $1,316 related to the Healthcare, Life Sciences and Isomedix segments, respectively. We do not expect to incur any significant additional restructuring expenses related to this plan. These actions are intended to enhance profitability and improve efficiencies.
The following table summarizes our total pre-tax restructuring expenses for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2015:
Fiscal 2014 Restructuring Plan | |||||||
Three months ended December 31, (1) | Nine months ended December 31, (2) | ||||||
Severance and other compensation related costs | $ | (1,242 | ) | $ | (262 | ) | |
Asset impairment and accelerated depreciation | — | (38 | ) | ||||
Lease termination obligation and other | 133 | 290 | |||||
Product rationalization | 33 | (417 | ) | ||||
Total restructuring expenses | $ | (1,076 | ) | $ | (427 | ) | |
(1) Includes $33 in expense recorded to cost of revenues on Consolidated Statements of Income.
(2) Includes $(417) in expense recorded to cost of revenues on Consolidated Statements of Income.
Pre-tax restructuring expenses of $808 and $878 incurred during the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2014, respectively, related to previously announced restructuring plans.
Liabilities related to restructuring activities are recorded as current liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets within “Accrued payroll and other related liabilities” and “Accrued expenses and other.” The following table summarizes our restructuring liability balances and activity:
8
STERIS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)—(Continued)
For the Three and Nine Months Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
(dollars in thousands)
Fiscal 2014 Restructuring Plan | ||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2015 | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2014 | Provision (1) | Payments (1) | December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||
Severance and termination benefits | $ | 6,389 | $ | (262 | ) | $ | (2,946 | ) | $ | 3,181 | ||||||
Lease termination obligations and other | 1,589 | 18 | (1,236 | ) | 371 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 7,978 | $ | (244 | ) | $ | (4,182 | ) | $ | 3,552 | ||||||
(1) Certain amounts reported include the impact of foreign currency movements relative to the U.S. dollar.
3. Property, Plant and Equipment
Information related to the major categories of our depreciable assets is as follows:
December 31, 2014 | March 31, 2014 | |||||||
Land and land improvements (1) | $ | 35,643 | $ | 33,601 | ||||
Buildings and leasehold improvements | 268,487 | 256,879 | ||||||
Machinery and equipment | 373,624 | 360,977 | ||||||
Information systems | 102,849 | 100,349 | ||||||
Radioisotope | 280,126 | 258,547 | ||||||
Construction in progress (1) | 33,904 | 35,016 | ||||||
Total property, plant, and equipment | 1,094,633 | 1,045,369 | ||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation and depletion | (619,148 | ) | (590,959 | ) | ||||
Property, plant, and equipment, net | $ | 475,485 | $ | 454,410 | ||||
(1) | Land is not depreciated. Construction in progress is not depreciated until placed in service. |
4. Inventories, Net
Inventories, net are stated at the lower of cost or market. We use the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) and first-in, first-out cost methods. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method is made only at the end of the fiscal year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations are based on management’s estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and are subject to the final fiscal year-end LIFO inventory valuation. Inventory costs include material, labor, and overhead. Inventories, net consisted of the following:
December 31, 2014 | March 31, 2014 | |||||||
Raw materials | $ | 74,502 | $ | 60,328 | ||||
Work in process | 27,584 | 24,449 | ||||||
Finished goods | 116,881 | 102,928 | ||||||
LIFO reserve | (17,171 | ) | (19,450 | ) | ||||
Reserve for excess and obsolete inventory | (18,340 | ) | (13,109 | ) | ||||
Inventories, net | $ | 183,456 | $ | 155,146 | ||||
5. Debt
Indebtedness was as follows:
9
STERIS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)—(Continued)
For the Three and Nine Months Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
(dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2014 | March 31, 2014 | |||||||
Private Placement | $ | 340,000 | $ | 340,000 | ||||
Credit Agreement and Swing Line Facility | 270,680 | 153,480 | ||||||
Total long term debt | $ | 610,680 | $ | 493,480 | ||||
Additional information regarding our indebtedness is included in the notes to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2014 dated May 29, 2014.
6. Additional Consolidated Balance Sheet Information
Additional information related to our Consolidated Balance Sheets is as follows:
December 31, 2014 | March 31, 2014 | |||||||
Accrued payroll and other related liabilities: | ||||||||
Compensation and related items | $ | 22,313 | $ | 19,418 | ||||
Accrued vacation/paid time off | 7,158 | 6,172 | ||||||
Accrued bonuses | 23,898 | 18,451 | ||||||
Accrued employee commissions | 11,175 | 11,322 | ||||||
Other postretirement benefit obligations-current portion | 2,950 | 2,950 | ||||||
Other employee benefit plans' obligations-current portion | 495 | 461 | ||||||
Total accrued payroll and other related liabilities | $ | 67,989 | $ | 58,774 | ||||
Accrued expenses and other: | ||||||||
Deferred revenues | $ | 38,685 | $ | 39,441 | ||||
Self-insured risk reserves-current portion | 5,872 | 4,656 | ||||||
Accrued dealer commissions | 11,949 | 10,017 | ||||||
Accrued warranty | 5,940 | 7,765 | ||||||
Other | 35,064 | 31,423 | ||||||
Total accrued expenses and other | $ | 97,510 | $ | 93,302 | ||||
Other liabilities: | ||||||||
Self-insured risk reserves-long-term portion | $ | 10,688 | $ | 10,689 | ||||
Other postretirement benefit obligations-long-term portion | 16,382 | 18,393 | ||||||
Defined benefit pension plans obligations-long-term portion | (154 | ) | 691 | |||||
Other employee benefit plans obligations-long-term portion | 6,105 | 6,013 | ||||||
Other | 3,831 | 3,091 | ||||||
Total other liabilities | $ | 36,852 | $ | 38,877 | ||||
7. Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense includes United States federal, state and local, and foreign income taxes, and is based on reported pre-tax income. The effective income tax rates for the three-month periods ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were 33.0% and 44.6%, respectively. During the third quarter of fiscal 2015, we benefited from the passage of the Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014 and discrete item adjustments. The effective income tax rates for the nine-month periods ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were 35.5% and 32.1%, respectively. During the first nine months of fiscal 2014, we benefited from the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits due to the settlement of a federal tax examination.
Income tax expense is provided on an interim basis based upon our estimate of the annual effective income tax rate, adjusted each quarter for discrete items. In determining the estimated annual effective income tax rate, we analyze various factors, including projections of our annual earnings and taxing jurisdictions in which the earnings will be generated, the impact of state and local income taxes, our ability to use tax credits and net operating loss carry forwards, and available tax planning alternatives.
10
STERIS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)—(Continued)
For the Three and Nine Months Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
(dollars in thousands)
As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2014, we had no unrecognized tax benefits and have not recorded any liability for interest and penalties.
We operate in numerous taxing jurisdictions and are subject to regular examinations by various United States federal, state and local authorities, as well as foreign jurisdictions. We are no longer subject to United States federal examinations for years before fiscal 2014 and, with limited exceptions, we are no longer subject to United States state and local or non-United States income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before fiscal 2010. We remain subject to tax authority audits in various jurisdictions wherever we do business. We do not expect the results of these examinations to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.
8. Benefit Plans
We provide defined benefit pension plans for certain former manufacturing and plant administrative personnel as determined by collective bargaining agreements or employee benefit standards set at the time of acquisition of certain businesses. In addition to providing pension benefits to certain employees, we sponsor an unfunded postretirement welfare benefits plan for two groups of United States employees, including some of the same employees who receive pension benefits. Benefits under this plan include retiree life insurance and retiree medical coverage, including prescription drug coverage. We are in the process of terminating our defined benefit pension plan covering certain former U.S. union employees.
Additional information regarding our defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefits plan is included in our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2014, dated May 29, 2014.
Components of the net periodic benefit cost for our defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement medical benefits plan were as follows:
Defined Benefit Pension Plans | Other Postretirement Benefits Plan | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended December 31, | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 35 | $ | 40 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Interest cost | 471 | 450 | 173 | 171 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (785 | ) | (861 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Amortization of loss | 277 | 365 | 180 | 223 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost | — | — | (816 | ) | (816 | ) | ||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | (2 | ) | $ | (6 | ) | $ | (463 | ) | $ | (422 | ) | ||||
Defined Benefit Pension Plans | Other Postretirement Benefits Plan | |||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended December 31, | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 105 | $ | 120 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Interest cost | 1,415 | 1,349 | 518 | 512 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (2,355 | ) | (2,582 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Amortization of loss | 830 | 1,094 | 541 | 668 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost | — | — | (2,447 | ) | (2,447 | ) | ||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | (5 | ) | $ | (19 | ) | $ | (1,388 | ) | $ | (1,267 | ) | ||||
We contribute amounts to the defined benefit pension plans at least sufficient to meet the minimum requirements as stated in applicable employee benefit laws and local tax laws. We record liabilities for the difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the benefit obligation (the projected benefit obligation for pension plans and the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for other postretirement benefits plans) on our accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
9. Commitments and Contingencies
11
STERIS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)—(Continued)
For the Three and Nine Months Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
(dollars in thousands)
We are, and will likely continue to be, involved in a number of legal proceedings, government investigations, and claims, which we believe generally arise in the course of our business, given our size, history, complexity, and the nature of our business, products, Customers, regulatory environment, and industries in which we participate. These legal proceedings, investigations and claims generally involve a variety of legal theories and allegations, including, without limitation, personal injury (e.g., slip and falls, burns, vehicle accidents), product liability or regulation (e.g., based on product operation or claimed malfunction, failure to warn, failure to meet specification, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements), product exposure (e.g., claimed exposure to chemicals, asbestos, contaminants, radiation), property damage (e.g., claimed damage due to leaking equipment, fire, vehicles, chemicals), commercial claims (e.g., breach of contract, economic loss, warranty, misrepresentation), financial (e.g., taxes, reporting), employment (e.g., wrongful termination, discrimination, benefits matters), and other claims for damage and relief.
We believe we have adequately reserved for our current litigation and claims that are probable and estimable, and further believe that the ultimate outcome of these pending lawsuits and claims will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations taken as a whole. Due to their inherent uncertainty, however, there can be no assurance of the ultimate outcome or effect of current or future litigation, investigations, claims or other proceedings (including without limitation the matters discussed below). For certain types of claims, we presently maintain insurance coverage for personal injury and property damage and other liability coverages in amounts and with deductibles that we believe are prudent, but there can be no assurance that these coverages will be applicable or adequate to cover adverse outcomes of claims or legal proceedings against us.
In April 2010, after ongoing discussions with the FDA regarding a 2008 warning letter relating to our SYSTEM 1® sterile processor and related sterilant, we reached agreement with the FDA on the terms of a consent decree (“Consent Decree”). The Consent Decree was approved the same month by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. In general, among other matters, the Consent Decree restricts further sales of SYSTEM 1 processors in the U.S., prohibits the sale of liquid chemical sterilization or disinfection products in the U.S. that do not have FDA clearance, describes various process and compliance matters, and defines penalties in the event of violation of the Consent Decree.
On May 31, 2012, our Albert Browne Limited subsidiary received a warning letter from the FDA regarding chemical indicators manufactured in the United Kingdom. These devices are intended for the monitoring of certain sterilization and other processes. The FDA warning letter states that the agency has concerns regarding operational business processes. We do not believe that the FDA's concerns are related to product performance, or that they result from Customer complaints. We have reviewed our processes with the agency and finalized our remediation measures, and are awaiting FDA reinspection. We do not currently believe that the impact of this event will have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
On May 23, 2014, the Company received a warning letter from the FDA regarding an inspection that the FDA concluded on January 8, 2014 at our STERIS Isomedix Services facility located in Libertyville, Illinois. The facility primarily provides microbial reduction services for certain medical device Customers. Among other matters, the FDA warning letter asserts that certain processes and procedures observed during the inspection did not conform to current Good Manufacturing Practices for medical devices as required by Title 21 CFR Part 820 and, as a result, that certain devices processed at the subject facility are adulterated within the meaning of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Since the inspection, the Company has provided detailed responses to the FDA regarding its corrective actions, and has continued to work diligently to remediate the FDA’s concerns. We do not believe that this inspection was a result of Customer complaints and there have been no reports of patient injury. We do not expect this situation to have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial condition.
Other civil, criminal, regulatory or other proceedings involving our products or services could possibly result in judgments, settlements or administrative or judicial decrees requiring us, among other actions, to pay damages or fines or effect recalls, or be subject to other governmental, Customer or other third party claims or remedies, which could materially effect our business, performance, prospects, value, financial condition, and results of operations.
For additional information regarding these matters, see the following portions of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014: “Business - Information with respect to our Business in General - Government Regulation”, and the “Risk Factor” titled “We may be adversely affected by product liability claims or other legal actions or regulatory or compliance matters, including the Warning Letter and Consent Decree” and the "Risk Factor” titled “Compliance with the Consent Decree may be more costly and burdensome than anticipated.”
From time to time, STERIS is also involved in legal proceedings as a plaintiff involving contract, patent protection, and other claims asserted by us. Gains, if any, from these proceedings are recognized when they are realized.
12
STERIS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)—(Continued)
For the Three and Nine Months Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
(dollars in thousands)
On December 19, 2014, a stockholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the Court of Common Pleas, Cuyahoga County, Ohio, against the members of STERIS’s board of directors and its named executive officers, challenging the “excise tax make-whole payments” approved by STERIS’s board in connection with the proposed Synergy transaction. STERIS is named as a nominal defendant in the action. These payments are in respect of an excise tax that will be imposed, by virtue of the transaction, solely on the value of any outstanding stock compensation held by STERIS board members and executive officers, and are intended to place these individuals in the same excise tax-neutral position with respect to their STERIS equity awards after the transaction as before. The case is captioned St. Lucie County Fire District Firefighters’ Pension Trust Fund v. Rosebrough, Jr., et al., Case No. CV 14 837749. The complaint generally alleges that STERIS’s board breached their fiduciary duties by approving the excise tax make-whole payments, that the payments constitute corporate waste and that the payments are voidable under Ohio law. The complaint seeks among other things a declaration that the excise tax make-whole payments are invalid, damages, disgorgement of any excise tax make-whole payments and plaintiffs’ costs and disbursements in the action, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, expert fees, costs and expenses.
We are subject to taxation from United States federal, state and local, and foreign jurisdictions. Tax positions are settled primarily through the completion of audits within each individual jurisdiction or the closing of statute of limitation. Changes in applicable tax law or other events may also require us to revise past estimates.
Additional information regarding our contingencies is included in Item 7 of Part II titled, “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations,” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2014 dated May 29, 2014, and in Item 1 of Part II of this Form 10-Q titled, “Legal Proceedings.”
10. Business Segment Information
We operate and report in three business segments: Healthcare, Life Sciences, and Isomedix. Corporate and other, which is presented separately, contains the Defense and Industrial business unit plus costs that are associated with being a publicly traded company and certain other corporate costs.
Our Healthcare segment manufactures and sells capital equipment, accessory, consumable, and service solutions to healthcare providers, including acute care hospitals, surgery and gastrointestinal centers. These solutions aid our Customers in improving the safety, quality, and productivity of their surgical, sterile processing, gastrointestinal, and emergency environments.
Our Life Sciences segment manufactures and sells capital equipment, formulated cleaning chemistries, and service solutions to pharmaceutical companies, and private and public research facilities.
Our Isomedix segment operates through a network of facilities located in North America. We sell a comprehensive array of contract sterilization services using gamma irradiation and ethylene oxide (“EO”) technologies as well as an array of laboratory testing services. We provide microbial reduction services based on Customer specifications to companies that supply products to the healthcare, industrial, and consumer products industries.
Financial information for each of our segments is presented in the following table. Operating income (loss) for each segment is calculated as the segment’s gross profit less direct expenses and indirect cost allocations, which results in the full allocation of all distribution and research and development expenses, and the partial allocation of corporate costs. These allocations are based upon variables such as segment headcount and revenues. In addition, the Healthcare segment is responsible for the management of all but one manufacturing facility and uses standard cost to sell products to the Life Sciences segment. Corporate and other includes the gross profit and direct expenses of the Defense and Industrial business unit, as well as certain unallocated corporate costs related to being a publicly traded company and legacy pension and post-retirement benefits.
The accounting policies for reportable segments are the same as those for the consolidated Company. For the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2014, revenues from a single Customer did not represent ten percent or more of any reportable segment’s revenues. Additional information regarding our segments is included in our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2014 dated May 29, 2014.
Financial information for each of our segments is presented in the following tables:
13
STERIS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)—(Continued)
For the Three and Nine Months Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended December 31, | Nine Months Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
Healthcare | $ | 353,197 | $ | 291,831 | $ | 1,007,176 | $ | 828,051 | ||||||||
Life Sciences | 67,997 | 64,128 | 185,759 | 182,425 | ||||||||||||
Isomedix | 50,960 | 49,157 | 154,003 | 144,792 | ||||||||||||
Total reportable segments | 472,154 | 405,116 | 1,346,938 | 1,155,268 | ||||||||||||
Corporate and other | 1,090 | 435 | 1,678 | 1,697 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 473,244 | $ | 405,551 | $ | 1,348,616 | $ | 1,156,965 | ||||||||
Operating income: | ||||||||||||||||
Healthcare | $ | 33,843 | $ | 31,238 | $ | 81,752 | $ | 72,111 | ||||||||
Life Sciences | 16,402 | 12,092 | 41,395 | 38,672 | ||||||||||||
Isomedix | 12,508 | 14,054 | 43,098 | 42,484 | ||||||||||||
Total reportable segments | 62,753 | 57,384 | 166,245 | 153,267 | ||||||||||||
Corporate and other | (1,407 | ) | (1,494 | ) | (7,308 | ) | (6,065 | ) | ||||||||
Total operating income | $ | 61,346 | $ | 55,890 | $ | 158,937 | $ | 147,202 | ||||||||
11. Common Shares
We calculate basic earnings per common share based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. We calculate diluted earnings per share based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of common share equivalents calculated using the treasury stock method. The following is a summary of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding used in the calculations of basic and diluted earnings per share:
Three Months Ended December 31, | Nine Months Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||
Denominator (shares in thousands): | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic | 59,475 | 58,885 | 59,340 | 58,972 | ||||||||
Dilutive effect of common share equivalents | 671 | 800 | 653 | 774 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding and common share equivalents—diluted | 60,146 | 59,685 | 59,993 | 59,746 | ||||||||
Options to purchase the following number of common shares were outstanding but excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the combined exercise prices, unamortized fair values, and assumed tax benefits upon exercise were greater than the average market price for the common shares during the periods, so including these options would be anti-dilutive:
Three Months Ended December 31, | Nine Months Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||
(shares in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Number of common share options | 268 | 304 | 367 | 336 | ||||||||
12. Repurchases of Common Shares
During the first nine months of fiscal 2015, we obtained 379,695 of our common shares in connection with stock based compensation award programs. At December 31, 2014, $86,939 of STERIS common shares remained authorized for repurchase pursuant to the most recent Board approved repurchase authorization (the March 2008 Board Authorization). Also, 10,478,783 common shares were held in treasury at December 31, 2014.
14
STERIS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)—(Continued)
For the Three and Nine Months Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
(dollars in thousands)
13. Share-Based Compensation
We maintain a long-term incentive plan that makes available common shares for grants, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, to officers, directors, and key employees in the form of stock options, restricted shares, restricted share units, stock appreciation rights and common share grants. Stock options provide the right to purchase our common shares at the market price on the date of grant, subject to the terms of the option plans and agreements. Generally, one-fourth of the stock options granted become exercisable for each full year of employment following the grant date. Stock options granted generally expire 10 years after the grant date, or earlier if the option holder is no longer employed by us. Restricted shares and restricted share units generally cliff vest after a four year period or vest in tranches of one-fourth of the number granted for each full year of employment after the grant date. As of December 31, 2014, 2,782,303 shares remained available for grant under the long-term incentive plan.
The fair value of share-based compensation awards was estimated at their grant date using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. This model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable, characteristics that are not present in our option grants. If the model permitted consideration of the unique characteristics of employee stock options, the resulting estimate of the fair value of the stock options could be different. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods in our Consolidated Statements of Income. The expense is classified as cost of goods sold or selling, general and administrative expenses in a manner consistent with the employee’s compensation and benefits.
The following weighted-average assumptions were used for options granted during the first nine months of fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014:
Fiscal 2015 | Fiscal 2014 | ||||
Risk-free interest rate | 1.89 | % | 0.95% | ||
Expected life of options | 5.75 years | 5.70 years | |||
Expected dividend yield of stock | 1.87 | % | 2.22% | ||
Expected volatility of stock | 29.86 | % | 31.22% | ||
The risk-free interest rate is based upon the U.S. Treasury yield curve. The expected life of options is reflective of our historical experience, vesting schedules and contractual terms. The expected dividend yield of stock represents our best estimate of the expected future dividend yield. The expected volatility of stock is derived by referring to our historical stock prices over a time frame similar to that of the expected life of the grant. An estimated forfeiture rate of 1.46% and 1.44% was applied in fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively. This rate is calculated based upon historical activity and represents an estimate of the granted options not expected to vest. If actual forfeitures differ from this calculated rate, we may be required to make additional adjustments to compensation expense in future periods. The assumptions used above are reviewed at the time of each significant option grant, or at least annually.
A summary of share option activity is as follows:
Number of Options | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Average Remaining Contractual Term | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | ||||||||||
Outstanding at March 31, 2014 | 2,396,986 | $ | 31.06 | ||||||||||
Granted | 384,532 | 53.40 | |||||||||||
Exercised | (703,904 | ) | 27.45 | ||||||||||
Forfeited | (33,528 | ) | 41.34 | ||||||||||
Canceled | (8,262 | ) | 20.69 | ||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2014 | 2,035,824 | $ | 36.40 | 6.2 years | $ | 57,917 | |||||||
Exercisable at December 31, 2014 | 1,305,989 | $ | 30.90 | 4.9 years | $ | 44,336 | |||||||
We estimate that 719,494 of the non-vested stock options outstanding at December 31, 2014 will ultimately vest.
15
STERIS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)—(Continued)
For the Three and Nine Months Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
(dollars in thousands)
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax difference between the $64.85 closing price of our common shares on December 31, 2014 over the exercise prices of the stock options, multiplied by the number of options outstanding or outstanding and exercisable, as applicable. The aggregate intrinsic value is not recorded for financial accounting purposes and the value changes daily based on the daily changes in the fair market value of our common shares.
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the first nine months of fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 was $22,289 and $8,620, respectively. Net cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options were $19,245 and $11,877 for the first nine months of fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, respectively. The tax benefit from shared-based compensation was $8,880 and $1,864 for the first nine months of fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, respectively.
The weighted average grant date fair value of stock option grants was $13.41 and $10.59 for the first nine months of fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, respectively.
Stock appreciation rights (“SARS”) carry generally the same terms and vesting requirements as stock options except that they are settled in cash upon exercise and therefore, are classified as liabilities. The fair value of the outstanding SARS as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $2,073 and $1,473, respectively. The fair value of outstanding SARs is revalued at each reporting date and the related liability and expense are adjusted appropriately.
A summary of the non-vested restricted share activity is presented below:
Number of Restricted Shares | Number of Restricted Share Units | Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value | ||||||||
Non-vested at March 31, 2014 | 931,018 | 14,976 | $ | 36.60 | ||||||
Granted | 267,656 | 38,226 | 53.56 | |||||||
Vested | (298,486 | ) | (17,183 | ) | 34.37 | |||||
Canceled | (44,547 | ) | (4,180 | ) | 42.24 | |||||
Non-vested at December 31, 2014 | 855,641 | 31,839 | $ | 42.92 | ||||||
Restricted shares granted are valued based on the closing stock price at the grant date. The value of restricted shares that vested during the first nine months of fiscal 2015 was $9,970.
Restricted share units carry generally the same terms and vesting requirements as restricted stock except that they may be settled in stock or cash upon vesting. Those that are settled in cash are classified as liabilities. The fair value of outstanding cash-settled restricted share units as of December 31, 2014 and March 31, 2014 was $308 and $1,259, respectively. The fair value of each cash-settled restricted share unit is revalued at each reporting date and the related liability and expense are adjusted appropriately.
As of December 31, 2014, there was a total of $29,001 in unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation granted under our share-based compensation plans. We expect to recognize the cost over a weighted average period of 2.31 years.
14. Financial and Other Guarantees
We generally offer a limited parts and labor warranty on capital equipment. The specific terms and conditions of those warranties vary depending on the product sold and the countries where we conduct business. We record a liability for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time product revenues are recognized. The amounts we expect to incur on behalf of our Customers for the future estimated cost of these warranties are recorded as a current liability on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Factors that affect the amount of our warranty liability include the number and type of installed units, historical and anticipated rates of product failures, and material and service costs per claim. We periodically assess the adequacy of our recorded warranty liabilities and adjust the amounts as necessary.
16
STERIS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)—(Continued)
For the Three and Nine Months Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
(dollars in thousands)
Changes in our warranty liability during the first nine months of fiscal 2015 were as follows:
Balance, March 31, 2014 | $ | 7,765 | |
Warranties issued during the period | 5,249 | ||
Settlements made during the period | (7,074 | ) | |
Balance, December 31, 2014 | $ | 5,940 | |
We also sell product maintenance contracts to our Customers. These contracts range in terms from one to five years and require us to maintain and repair the product over the maintenance contract term. We initially record amounts due from Customers under these contracts as a liability for deferred service contract revenue on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets within “Accrued expenses and other.” The liability recorded for such deferred service revenue was $30,830 and $31,079 as of December 31, 2014 and March 31, 2014, respectively. Such deferred revenue is then amortized on a straight-line basis over the contract term and recognized as service revenue on our accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income. The activity related to the liability for deferred service contract revenues is excluded from the table presented above.
15. Forward and Swap Contracts
From time to time, we enter into forward contracts to hedge potential foreign currency gains and losses that arise from transactions denominated in foreign currencies, including inter-company transactions. We may also enter into commodity swap contracts to hedge price changes in nickel that impacts raw materials included in our cost of revenues. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. These contracts are not designated as hedging instruments and do not receive hedge accounting treatment; therefore, changes in their fair value are not deferred but are recognized immediately in the Consolidated Statements of Income. At December 31, 2014, we held foreign currency forward contracts to buy 34 million Mexican pesos, and 8 million Canadian dollars. At December 31, 2014, we held commodity swap contracts to buy 128.7 thousand pounds of nickel.
Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | |||||||||||||||
Fair Value at | Fair Value at | Fair Value at | Fair Value at | |||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Location | December 31, 2014 | March 31, 2014 | December 31, 2014 | March 31, 2014 | ||||||||||||
Prepaid & Other | $ | 9 | $ | 167 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Accrued expenses and other | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 88 | $ | 67 | ||||||||
The following table presents the impact of derivative instruments and their location within the Consolidated Statements of Income:
Location of gain (loss) recognized in income | Amount of gain (loss) recognized in income | |||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended December 31, | Nine Months Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||
Foreign currency forward contracts | Selling, general and administrative | $ | (513 | ) | $ | (271 | ) | $ | (660 | ) | $ | (842 | ) | |||||
Commodity swap contracts | Cost of revenues | $ | (100 | ) | $ | — | $ | 214 | $ | (57 | ) | |||||||
16. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We estimate the fair value of financial assets and liabilities using available market information and generally accepted valuation methodologies. The inputs used to measure fair value are classified into three tiers. These tiers include Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable;
17
STERIS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)—(Continued)
For the Three and Nine Months Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
(dollars in thousands)
and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring the entity to develop its own assumptions. The following table shows the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities at December 31, 2014 and March 31, 2014:
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014 and March 31, 2014 Using | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying Value | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets | Significant Other Observable Inputs | Significant Unobservable Inputs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31 | March 31 | December 31 | March 31 | December 31 | March 31 | December 31 | March 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents (1) | $ | 144,512 | $ | 152,802 | $ | 125,768 | $ | 137,189 | $ | 18,744 | $ | 15,613 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||
Forward and swap contracts (2) | 9 | 167 | — | — | 9 | 167 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Investments (3) | 7,322 | 3,397 | 7,322 | 3,397 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forward and swap contracts (2) | $ | 88 | $ | 67 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 88 | $ | 67 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||
Deferred compensation plans (3) | 3,688 | 3,495 | 3,688 | 3,495 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Long term debt (4) | 610,680 | 493,480 | — | — | 633,079 | 511,690 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Contingent consideration obligations (5) | 6,545 | 9,887 | — | — | — | — | 6,545 | 9,887 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Money market fund holdings are classified as level two as active market quoted prices are not available.
(2) The fair values of forward and swap contracts are based on period-end forward rates and reflect the value of the amount that we would pay or receive for the contracts involving the same notional amounts and maturity dates.
(3) We maintain a frozen domestic non-qualified deferred compensation plan covering certain employees, which allowed for the deferral of payment of previously earned compensation for an employee-specified term or until retirement or termination. Amounts deferred can be allocated to various hypothetical investment options (compensation deferrals have been frozen under the plan). We hold investments to satisfy the future obligations of the plan. Changes in the value of the investment accounts are recognized each period based on the fair value of the underlying investments. Employees who made deferrals are entitled to receive distributions of their hypothetical account balances (amounts deferred, together with earnings (losses)). We also hold an investment in the common stock of Servizi Italia, S.p.A, a leading provider of integrated linen washing and outsourced sterile processing services to hospital Customers. Changes in the value of the investment are recognized each period based on the fair value of the investment.
(4) We estimate the fair value of our long-term debt using discounted cash flow analyses, based on our current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
(5) Contingent consideration obligations arise from prior business acquisitions. The fair values are based on discounted cash flow analyses reflecting the possible achievement of specified performance measures or events and captures the contractual nature of the contingencies, commercial risk, and the time value of money. Contingent consideration obligations are classified in the consolidated balance sheets as accrued expense (short-term) and other liabilities (long-term), as appropriate based on the contractual payment dates.
The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2014 are summarized as follows:
Contingent Consideration | |||
Balance at March 31, 2014 | $ | 9,887 | |
Deductions | (5,061 | ) | |
(Gains)/Losses | 2,040 | ||
Foreign currency translation adjustments (1) | (321 | ) | |
Balance at December 31, 2014 | $ | 6,545 | |
18
STERIS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)—(Continued)
For the Three and Nine Months Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
(dollars in thousands)
(1) Reported in other comprehensive income (loss).
Information regarding our investments is as follows:
Investments at December 31, 2014 and March 31, 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost | Unrealized Gains | Unrealized Losses (2) | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31 | March 31 | December 31 | March 31 | December 31 | March 31 | December 31 | March 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities (1) | $ | 4,681 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (946 | ) | $ | — | $ | 3,735 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
Mutual funds | 2,656 | 2,608 | 931 | 789 | — | — | 3,587 | 3,397 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale securities | $ | 7,337 | $ | 2,608 | $ | 931 | $ | 789 | $ | (946 | ) | $ | — | $ | 7,322 | $ | 3,397 | |||||||||||||||
(1) Our marketable equity securities have been in a unrealized loss position for less than 12 months.
(2) Amounts reported include the impact of foreign currency movements relative to the U.S. dollar.
17. Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Amounts in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) are presented net of the related tax. Foreign Currency Translation is not adjusted for income taxes. Changes in our Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) balances, net of tax, for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2014 were as follows:
Gain (Loss) on Available for Sale Securities (1) | Defined Benefit Plans (2) | Foreign Currency Translation | Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months | Nine Months | Three Months | Nine Months | Three Months | Nine Months | Three Months | Nine Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning Balance | $ | 620 | $ | 561 | $ | (2,871 | ) | $ | (2,428 | ) | $ | (10,343 | ) | $ | 6,348 | $ | (12,594 | ) | $ | 4,481 | |||||||||||
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) before reclassifications | (598 | ) | (605 | ) | 247 | 742 | (18,806 | ) | (35,497 | ) | (19,157 | ) | (35,360 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Amounts reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | 29 | 95 | (469 | ) | (1,407 | ) | — | — | (440 | ) | (1,312 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net current-period Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | (569 | ) | (510 | ) | (222 | ) | (665 | ) | (18,806 | ) | (35,497 | ) | (19,597 | ) | (36,672 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2014 | $ | 51 | $ | 51 | $ | (3,093 | ) | $ | (3,093 | ) | $ | (29,149 | ) | $ | (29,149 | ) | $ | (32,191 | ) | $ | (32,191 | ) | |||||||||
Details of amounts reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) are as follows:
(1) Realized gain (loss) on available for sale securities is reported in the interest income and miscellaneous expense line of the Consolidated Statements of Income.
(2) Amortization (gain) of defined benefit pension items is reported in the selling, general and administrative expense line of the Consolidated Statements of Income.
18. Business Acquisitions
19
STERIS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)—(Continued)
For the Three and Nine Months Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
(dollars in thousands)
On December 31, 2014, a newly formed subsidiary of the Company purchased the assets and assumed certain liabilities of AGAPE Instruments Service, Inc. ("AGAPE"), a provider of certification services located near Cincinnati, Ohio.
The purchase price was approximately $3,312, subject to a customary working capital adjustment. AGAPE will be integrated into the Life Sciences business segment. The purchase price has been preliminarily allocated to the net assets acquired based on fair values at the acquisition date. A Customer relationship intangible of $1,200, tangible and financial net assets of $316 and goodwill of $1,796 have been recorded.
Acquisition related costs were insignificant. The Consolidated Financial Statements will include the operating results of the new subsidiary from the date of acquisition. Pro-forma results of operations for fiscal 2015 and 2014 periods have not been presented because the effects of the acquisition were not material to our financial results.The acquisition was financed through a combination of credit facility borrowings and cash on hand.
On May 9, 2014, we completed the previously announced acquisition of all the outstanding shares of capital stock of Integrated Medical Systems International, Inc. ("IMS") pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement dated March 31, 2014. The purchase price was approximately $165,000, subject to a customary working capital adjustment. In addition, we purchased certain real estate used in the IMS business for approximately $10,000. IMS has facilities located in Alabama, Florida and Maryland and provides a variety of services including: endoscope repair, surgical instrument management and sterile processing consulting. IMS is being integrated into our Healthcare segment as part of our Specialty Services business. The acquisition was financed through a combination of credit facility borrowings and cash on hand.
We recorded acquisition related costs of $3,105, before tax, which are reported in selling, general and administrative expense. We anticipate that the acquisition of IMS will qualify for a joint election tax benefit under Section 338(h)(10) of the Internal Revenue Code, which allows goodwill and intangibles to be fully deductible for tax purposes. Intangible assets acquired consist of trade names and Customer relationships, which will be amortized on a straight line basis over their useful lives of up to nine years, with the exception of the IMS trade name which has an indefinite life.
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the operating results of the IMS acquisition from the acquisition date. Pro-forma results of operations for the fiscal 2014 periods have not been presented because the effects of the acquisition were not material to our financial results.
The table below summarizes the preliminary allocation of the IMS purchase price to the net assets acquired based on fair values at the acquisition date.
IMS | |||
Accounts receivable | $ | 16,594 | |
Inventory | 8,478 | ||
Property, plant and equipment | 15,074 | ||
Other assets | 842 | ||
Intangible assets | 62,000 | ||
Goodwill | 81,587 | ||
Total assets acquired | 184,575 | ||
Accounts payable | (4,833 | ) | |
Current liabilities | (6,837 | ) | |
Total liabilities assumed | (11,670 | ) | |
Net assets acquired | $ | 172,905 | |
19. Proposed Acquisition of Synergy Health plc
On October 13, 2014, we announced that we were commencing a "recommended offer" under U.K. law to acquire all outstanding shares of Synergy Health plc ("Synergy") in a cash and stock transaction valued at £19.50 ($31.35) per Synergy share, or a total of approximately $1.9 billion based on STERIS’s closing stock price of $56.38 per share on October 10, 2014. Based on STERIS’s closing stock price of $67.00 and exchange rates as of February 3, 2015, the total value of the cash and
20
STERIS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)—(Continued)
For the Three and Nine Months Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
(dollars in thousands)
stock transaction is approximately $2.1 billion or £23.42 ($35.52) per Synergy share. The transaction is subject to certain customary closing conditions, including approvals by STERIS and Synergy shareholders as well as regulatory approvals in the U.S. and U.K. Although both STERIS and Synergy continue to work toward closing the Merger by April 1, 2015, as previously discussed in STERIS’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 9, 2015, the request for additional information and documentary material, often referred to as a “second request,” from the Federal Trade Commission in connection with the Merger may extend the transaction timing beyond April 1, 2015 and no assurance can be provided as to when or if the transaction will be completed.
On October 13, 2014, we obtained a Bridge Facility from a group of three lenders. Under the Bridge Credit Agreement, the lenders have agreed to provide senior unsecured debt financing, to consist of up to £340 million of commitments, and up to $1.1 billion of commitments. The proceeds will be used in part to pay the cash portion of the purchase price for the transaction. To the extent that alternative sources of financing to replace the Bridge Credit Agreement are not procured at or prior to the transaction closing, the proceeds of the Bridge Credit Agreement may be used to (i) finance the payment of the cash consideration for the transaction, and related fees and expenses and (ii) to pay or refinance our existing debt and Synergy debt.
20. U.K. Takeover Code Directors’ Confirmation
Under Rule 28.1 of the U.K.’s City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (the “Takeover Code”) which applies in light of our proposed acquisition of Synergy Health, our directors must provide a so-called “directors’ confirmation” in respect of our Consolidated Net Income for the three months ended December 31, 2014 reported in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Net Income Statement”) because it constitutes an unaudited profit estimate for the purposes of the Takeover Code. Accordingly, our directors confirm that:
(i) the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three months ended December 31, 2014, has been properly compiled on the basis of the assumptions contained or referred to in this Quarterly Report; and
(ii) the basis of accounting used for the purposes of preparing the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three months ended December 31, 2014, is consistent with our accounting policies.
21
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Shareholders
STERIS Corporation
We have reviewed the consolidated balance sheets of STERIS Corporation and subsidiaries (“STERIS”) as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the three- and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine-month periods ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. These financial statements are the responsibility of STERIS management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of STERIS Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements in our report dated May 29, 2014. In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of STERIS Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2014 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
February 9, 2015
22
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Introduction
In Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (the “MD&A”), we explain the general financial condition and the results of operations for STERIS including:
• | what factors affect our business; |
• | what our earnings and costs were in each period presented; |
• | why those earnings and costs were different from prior periods; |
• | where our earnings came from; |
• | how this affects our overall financial condition; |
• | what our expenditures for capital projects were; and |
• | where cash will come from to fund future debt principal repayments, growth outside of core operations, repurchase common shares, pay cash dividends and fund future working capital needs. |
As you read the MD&A, it may be helpful to refer to information in our consolidated financial statements, which present the results of our operations for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014. It may also be helpful to read the MD&A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2014, dated May 29, 2014. In the MD&A, we analyze and explain the period-over-period changes in the specific line items in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Our analysis may be important to you in making decisions about your investments in STERIS.
Financial Measures
In the following sections of the MD&A, we may, at times, refer to financial measures that are not required to be presented in the consolidated financial statements under U.S. GAAP. We sometimes use the following financial measures in the context of this report: backlog; debt-to-total capital; net debt-to-total capital; and days sales outstanding. We define these financial measures as follows:
• | Backlog – We define backlog as the amount of unfilled capital equipment purchase orders at a point in time. We use this figure as a measure to assist in the projection of short-term financial results and inventory requirements. |
• | Debt-to-total capital – We define debt-to-total capital as total debt divided by the sum of total debt and shareholders’ equity. We use this figure as a financial liquidity measure to gauge our ability to borrow and fund growth. |
• | Net debt-to-total capital – We define net debt-to-total capital as total debt less cash (“net debt”) divided by the sum of net debt and shareholders’ equity. We also use this figure as a financial liquidity measure to gauge our ability to borrow and fund growth. |
• | Days sales outstanding (“DSO”) – We define DSO as the average collection period for accounts receivable. It is calculated as net accounts receivable divided by the trailing four quarters’ revenues, multiplied by 365 days. We use this figure to help gauge the quality of accounts receivable and expected time to collect. |
We, at times, may also refer to financial measures which are considered to be “non-GAAP financial measures” under SEC rules. We have presented these financial measures because we believe that meaningful analysis of our financial performance is enhanced by an understanding of certain additional factors underlying that performance. These financial measures should not be considered an alternative to measures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Our calculations of these measures may differ from calculations of similar measures used by other companies and you should be careful when comparing these financial measures to those of other companies. Additional information regarding these financial measures, including reconciliations of each non- GAAP financial measure, is available in the subsection of MD&A titled, "Non-GAAP Financial Measures."
Revenues – Defined
As required by Regulation S-X, we separately present revenues generated as either product revenues or service revenues on our Consolidated Statements of Income for each period presented. When we discuss revenues, we may, at times, refer to revenues summarized differently than the Regulation S-X requirements. The terminology, definitions, and applications of terms that we use to describe revenues may be different from terms used by other companies. We use the following terms to describe revenues:
23
• | Revenues – Our revenues are presented net of sales returns and allowances. |
• | Product Revenues – We define product revenues as revenues generated from sales of consumable and capital equipment products. |
• | Service Revenues – We define service revenues as revenues generated from parts and labor associated with the maintenance, repair, and installation of our capital equipment, instrument repair services, and revenues generated from contract sterilization offered through our Isomedix segment. |
• | Capital Revenues – We define capital revenues as revenues generated from sales of capital equipment, which includes steam sterilizers, low temperature liquid chemical sterilant processing systems, including SYSTEM 1 and 1E, washing systems, VHP® technology, water stills, and pure steam generators; surgical lights and tables; and integrated OR. |
• | Consumable Revenues – We define consumable revenues as revenues generated from sales of the consumable family of products, which includes SYSTEM 1 and 1E consumables, V-Pro consumables, gastrointestinal endoscopy accessories, sterility assurance products, skin care products, cleaning consumables, and surgical instruments. |
• | Recurring Revenues – We define recurring revenues as revenues generated from sales of consumable products and service revenues. |
General Company Overview and Executive Summary
Our mission is to help our Customers create a healthier and safer world by providing innovative healthcare and life science product and service solutions around the globe. Our dedicated employees around the world work together to supply a broad range of solutions by offering a combination of capital equipment, consumables, and services to healthcare, pharmaceutical, industrial, and governmental Customers.
The bulk of our revenues are derived from the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries. Much of the growth in these industries is driven by the aging of the population throughout the world, as an increasing number of individuals are entering their prime healthcare consumption years, and is dependent upon advancement in healthcare delivery, acceptance of new technologies, government policies, and general economic conditions. In addition, each of our core industries is experiencing specific trends that could increase demand. Within healthcare, there is increased concern regarding the level of hospital-acquired infections around the world. The pharmaceutical industry has been impacted by increased FDA scrutiny of cleaning and validation processes, mandating that manufacturers improve their processes. The aging population increases the demand for medical procedures, which increases the consumption of single use medical devices and surgical kits processed by our Isomedix segment.
We are actively pursuing new opportunities to adapt our proven technologies to meet the changing needs of the global marketplace.
We also are pursuing a strategy of expanding into adjacent markets with acquisitions. On October 13, 2014, the Company commenced a "recommended offer" to acquire Synergy Health plc ("Synergy") in a cash and stock transaction valued at $1.9 billion. As indicated in the transaction announcement, the combined business is expected to have approximately $2.6 billion in annual revenues from over 60 countries, approximately 14,000 employees, and will combine STERIS’s strong presence in North America with Synergy's strong positions across Europe.
On May 9, 2014, the Company acquired Integrated Medical Systems International, Inc. ("IMS"). IMS has facilities located in Alabama, Florida and Maryland and provides a variety of services, including: endoscope repair, surgical instrument management and sterile processing consulting. IMS will be integrated into our Healthcare segment as part of our Specialty Services business.
On December 31, 2014, a newly formed subsidiary of the Company acquired the assets of and assumed certain liabilities of AGAPE, a provider of certification services located near Cincinnati, Ohio. AGAPE will be integrated into our Life Sciences business segment.
Fiscal 2015 third quarter revenues were $473.2 million representing an increase of 16.7% over the fiscal 2014 third quarter revenues of $405.6 million, reflecting growth within all three business segments. Fiscal 2015 first nine months revenues were $1,348.6 million representing an increase of 16.6% over the first nine months of fiscal 2014 revenues of $1,157.0 million, reflecting growth within all three business segments.
Fiscal 2015 third quarter gross margin percentage was 41.7% compared with 40.4% for the fiscal 2014 third quarter, while fiscal 2015 first nine months gross margin percentage was 41.6% compared with 40.2% for the first nine months of fiscal 2014. The improved gross margin percentages in the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2015 were due in part to the positive gross margin impact of favorable product mix and foreign currency. Our third quarter gross margin percentage was negatively impacted by rising material costs and inflation. Although our recent acquisitions added value in terms of dollars, they
24
negatively impacted our gross margin percentage for the fiscal 2015 first nine months, along with rising material costs and inflation.
Fiscal 2015 third quarter operating income was $61.3 million, compared to fiscal 2014 third quarter operating income of $55.9 million. Fiscal 2015 first nine months operating income was $158.9 million compared to the fiscal 2014 first nine months operating income of $147.2 million. These increases in operating income are primarily attributable to the higher gross margin attainment as well as the increase in volume in the fiscal 2015 third quarter and first nine months over the same fiscal 2014 periods.
Cash flows from operations were $165.2 million and free cash flow was $109.3 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2015 compared to cash flows from operations of $142.2 million and free cash flow of $82.1 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2014. The increases in cash flow from operations and free cash flow are primarily due to working capital improvements and lower capital spending in fiscal 2015 over fiscal 2014 (see subsection of MD&A titled, "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for additional information and related reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable GAAP measures). Our debt-to-total capital ratio was 36.2% at December 31, 2014 and 32.2% at March 31, 2014. During the first nine months of fiscal 2015, we declared and paid quarterly cash dividends of $0.67 per common share.
Additional information regarding our financial performance during the fiscal third quarter and first nine months of 2015 is included in the subsection below titled “Results of Operations.”
Matters Affecting Comparability
International Operations. Since we conduct operations outside of the United States using various foreign currencies, our operating results are impacted by foreign currency movements relative to the U.S. dollar. During the third quarter of fiscal 2015, our revenues were unfavorably impacted by $3.9 million, or 0.8%, and income before taxes was favorably impacted by $3.4 million, or 6.3%, as a result of foreign currency movements relative to the U.S. dollar. During the first nine months of fiscal 2015, our revenues were unfavorably impacted by $2.2 million, or 0.2%, and income before taxes was favorably impacted by $5.4 million, or 3.8%, as a result of foreign currency movements relative to the U.S. dollar.
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
We, at times, refer to financial measures which are considered to be “non-GAAP financial measures” under SEC rules. We, at times, also refer to our results of operations excluding certain transactions or amounts that are non-recurring or are not indicative of future results, in order to provide meaningful comparisons between the periods presented.
These non-GAAP financial measures are not intended to be, and should not be, considered separately from or as an alternative to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.
These non-GAAP financial measures are presented with the intent of providing greater transparency to supplemental financial information used by management and the Board of Directors in their financial analysis and operational decision-making. These amounts are disclosed so that the reader has the same financial data that management uses with the belief that it will assist investors and other readers in making comparisons to our historical operating results and analyzing the underlying performance of our operations for the periods presented.
We believe that the presentation of these non-GAAP financial measures, when considered along with our GAAP financial measures and the reconciliation to the corresponding GAAP financial measures, provide the reader with a more complete understanding of the factors and trends affecting our business than could be obtained absent this disclosure. It is important for the reader to note that the non-GAAP financial measure used may be calculated differently from, and therefore may not be comparable to, a similarly titled measure used by other companies.
We define free cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows less purchases of property, plant, equipment, and intangibles plus proceeds from the sale of property, plant, equipment, and intangibles, which are also presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. We use this as a measure to gauge our ability to fund future debt principal repayments and growth outside of core operations, repurchase common shares, and pay cash dividends. The following table summarizes the calculation of our free cash flow for the nine month periods ended
25
December 31, 2014 and 2013:
Nine Months Ended December 31, | ||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||
Net cash flows provided by operating activities | $ | 165,210 | $ | 142,173 | ||||
Purchases of property, plant, equipment and intangibles, net | (56,757 | ) | (64,778 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant, equipment and intangibles | 812 | 4,739 | ||||||
Free cash flow | $ | 109,265 | $ | 82,134 | ||||
Results of Operations
In the following subsections, we discuss our earnings and the factors affecting them for the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2015 compared with the same fiscal 2014 periods. We begin with a general overview of our operating results and then separately discuss earnings for our operating segments.
Revenues. The following tables compare our revenues for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2014 to the revenues for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2013:
Three Months Ended December 31, | Percent | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2014 | 2013 | Change | Change | ||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 473,244 | $ | 405,551 | $ | 67,693 | 16.7 | % | ||||||
Revenues by type: | ||||||||||||||
Capital equipment revenues | 151,217 | 149,578 | 1,639 | 1.1 | % | |||||||||
Consumable revenues | 116,068 | 103,038 | 13,030 | 12.6 | % | |||||||||
Service revenues | 205,959 | 152,935 | 53,024 | 34.7 | % | |||||||||
Revenues by geography: | ||||||||||||||
United States revenues | 367,059 | 314,589 | 52,470 | 16.7 | % | |||||||||
International revenues | 106,185 | 90,962 | 15,223 | 16.7 | % | |||||||||
Nine Months Ended December 31, | Percent | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2014 | 2013 | Change | Change | ||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 1,348,616 | $ | 1,156,965 | $ | 191,651 | 16.6 | % | ||||||
Revenues by type: | ||||||||||||||
Capital equipment revenues | 415,100 | 408,775 | 6,325 | 1.5 | % | |||||||||
Consumable revenues | 339,470 | 302,078 | 37,392 | 12.4 | % | |||||||||
Service revenues | 594,046 | 446,112 | 147,934 | 33.2 | % | |||||||||
Revenues by geography: | ||||||||||||||
United States revenues | 1,049,892 | 900,592 | 149,300 | 16.6 | % | |||||||||
International revenues | 298,724 | 256,373 | 42,351 | 16.5 | % | |||||||||
Quarter over Quarter Comparison
Revenues increased $67.7 million, or 16.7%, to $473.2 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $405.6 million for the same quarter in the prior year. This increase is primarily attributable to our recent acquisitions and growth within all three business segments. Capital equipment revenues increased 1.1% in the fiscal 2015 third quarter over the fiscal 2014 third quarter. This increase is primarily attributable to strong growth within the Europe, Middle East, and Africa
26
("EMEA") region primarily due to our fiscal 2014 acquisition of Eschmann Holdings Ltd. Consumable revenues increased 12.6% for the quarter ended December 31, 2014, as compared to the prior year quarter, driven by growth within all regions. Service revenues increased 34.7% in the third quarter of fiscal 2015 primarily driven by the fiscal 2015 acquisition of IMS, and growth within the North America, EMEA and Asia Pacific regions, including an increase of 3.7% in the Isomedix business segment.
United States revenues increased $52.5 million, or 16.7%, to $367.1 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $314.6 million for the same prior year quarter. This increase is primarily attributable to the fiscal 2015 acquisition of IMS but also reflects growth in other service revenues in all three business segments and growth in consumable revenues in the Healthcare and Life Science business segments.
International revenues increased $15.2 million, or 16.7%, to $106.2 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $91.0 million for the same prior year quarter. This increase reflects revenue growth within the EMEA and Asia Pacific regions, partially offset by a decline in the Latin America region.
First Nine Months over First Nine Months Comparison
Revenues increased $191.7 million or 16.6% to $1,348.6 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2015, as compared to $1,157.0 million for the same prior year period. This increase is primarily attributable to our recent acquisitions and growth within all three business segments. Capital equipment revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2015 increased $6.3 million or 1.5% compared to the prior year period, reflecting growth within the Healthcare segment. Consumable revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2015 increased 12.4% over the first nine months of fiscal 2014 driven by growth of 12.5% and 12.0% within the Healthcare and Life Sciences business segments, respectively. Service revenues during the first nine months of fiscal 2015 increased 33.2% over the first nine months of fiscal 2014 primarily driven by the fiscal 2015 acquisition of IMS, and growth of 5.4% and 6.4% in the Life Sciences and Isomedix business segments, respectively.
United States revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2015 were $1,049.9 million, an increase of $149.3 million or 16.6% over the first nine months of fiscal 2014 revenues of $900.6 million. This increase is primarily attributable to the fiscal 2015 acquisition of IMS but also reflects growth in other service revenues in all three business segments and growth in consumable revenues in the Healthcare and Life Science business segments.
International revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2015 were $298.7 million, an increase of 16.5% over the first nine months of fiscal 2014 revenues of $256.4 million. This increase reflects revenue growth in the EMEA and Asia Pacific regions, partially offset by decline in the Latin America region.
Revenues by segment are further discussed in the section of MD&A titled, "Business Segment Results of Operations."
Gross Profit. The following tables compare our gross profit for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2014 to the three and nine months ended December 31, 2013:
Three Months Ended December 31, | Change | Percent Change | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||
Gross profit: | |||||||||||||||
Product | $ | 117,121 | $ | 107,732 | $ | 9,389 | 8.7 | % | |||||||
Service | 80,035 | 56,043 | 23,992 | 42.8 | % | ||||||||||
Total gross profit | $ | 197,156 | $ | 163,775 | $ | 33,381 | 20.4 | % | |||||||
Gross profit percentage: | |||||||||||||||
Product | 43.8 | % | 42.6 | % | |||||||||||
Service | 38.9 | % | 36.6 | % | |||||||||||
Total gross profit percentage | 41.7 | % | 40.4 | % | |||||||||||
27
Nine Months Ended December 31, | Change | Percent Change | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||
Gross profit: | |||||||||||||||
Product | $ | 331,440 | $ | 302,802 | $ | 28,638 | 9.5 | % | |||||||
Service | 229,801 | 162,325 | 67,476 | 41.6 | % | ||||||||||
Total gross profit | $ | 561,241 | $ | 465,127 | $ | 96,114 | 20.7 | % | |||||||
Gross profit percentage: | |||||||||||||||
Product | 43.9 | % | 42.6 | % | |||||||||||
Service | 38.7 | % | 36.4 | % | |||||||||||
Total gross profit percentage | 41.6 | % | 40.2 | % | |||||||||||
Our gross profit percentage is affected by the volume, pricing, and mix of sales of our products and services, as well as the costs associated with the products and services that are sold. Gross profit percentage for the third quarter of fiscal 2015 amounted to 41.7% as compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2014 gross profit percentage of 40.4%. The gross profit percentage increased 130 basis points in the third quarter of fiscal 2015 over fiscal 2014. Our gross profit percentage was impacted by the positive impact of foreign currency (70 basis points) and favorable product mix and other (120 basis points). Rising material costs (10 basis points), inflation (40 basis points) and the Medical Device Excise Tax (10 basis points) negatively impacted our gross margin percentage.
Gross profit percentage for the first nine months of fiscal 2015 was 41.6% compared to the gross profit percentage in the first nine months of fiscal 2014 of 40.2%. The gross profit percentage increased 140 basis points in the first nine months of fiscal 2015 over fiscal 2014. Our gross profit percentage was impacted by the positive impact of foreign currency (40 basis points) and favorable product mix and other (160 basis points). Although our recent acquisitions added value in terms of dollars, they negatively impacted our gross margin percentage by approximately 20 basis points. Rising material costs (10 basis points) and inflation (30 basis points) negatively impacted our gross margin percentage.
Operating Expenses. The following tables compare our operating expenses for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2014 to the three and nine months ended December 31, 2013:
Three Months Ended December 31, | Change | Percent Change | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||
Operating expenses: | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative | $ | 122,370 | $ | 95,497 | $ | 26,873 | 28.1 | % | |||||||
Research and development | 14,549 | 11,580 | 2,969 | 25.6 | % | ||||||||||
Restructuring expenses | (1,109 | ) | 808 | (1,917 | ) | NM | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 135,810 | $ | 107,885 | $ | 27,925 | 25.9 | % | |||||||
NM - Not meaningful.
Nine Months Ended December 31, | Change | Percent Change | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||
Operating expenses: | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative | $ | 362,350 | $ | 280,087 | $ | 82,263 | 29.4 | % | |||||||
Research and development | 39,964 | 36,960 | 3,004 | 8.1 | % | ||||||||||
Restructuring expenses | (10 | ) | 878 | (888 | ) | NM | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 402,304 | $ | 317,925 | $ | 84,379 | 26.5 | % | |||||||
Significant components of total selling, general, and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) are compensation and benefit costs, fees for professional services, travel and entertainment, facilities costs, and other general and administrative expenses. SG&A increased 28.1% in the third quarter of fiscal 2015 over the third quarter of fiscal 2014, and increased 29.4% in the first nine months of fiscal 2015 over the first nine months of fiscal 2014. These increases are primarily attributable to the addition of operating expenses incurred within our recently acquired businesses and costs of approximately $8.9 million incurred in connection with the proposed acquisition of Synergy. For additional information regarding this proposed transaction see Note 19 titled, "Proposed Acquisition of Synergy Health plc". Also, during the second quarter of fiscal 2015, SG&A was impacted by the adoption of a new branding strategy as part of the integration of IMS into the Specialty Services business for surgical
28
instrument and endoscope repair services. This strategy resulted in the reduction in the carrying value of the Spectrum Surgical Instruments Corp. ("Spectrum") trade-name which will be used solely for Specialty Services product revenues going forward. We have estimated the fair value of the Spectrum trade-name using the relief from royalty method and concluded that the carrying value of the trade-name exceeded its fair value. As a result, an impairment charge of approximately $5.6 million was recorded to reduce the carrying value of the intangible asset.
For the three month period ended December 31, 2014, research and development expenses increased 25.6% over the same prior year period. For the first nine months of fiscal 2015, research and development expenses were $40.0 million, representing an increase of 8.1% compared to the same fiscal 2014 period. Research and development expenses are influenced by the number and timing of in-process projects and labor hours and other costs associated with these projects. Our research and development initiatives continue to emphasize new product development, product improvements, and the development of new technological platform innovations. During fiscal 2015, our investments in research and development continued to be focused on, but were not limited to, enhancing capabilities of sterile processing combination technologies, surgical products and accessories, and devices and support accessories used in gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures. The increases in the fiscal 2015 periods are primarily attributable to additional spending in connection with the development of surgical products and accessories.
Fiscal 2014 Restructuring Plan. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we adopted and announced a targeted restructuring plan primarily focused on the closure of our Hopkins manufacturing facility located in Mentor, Ohio (the “Fiscal 2014 Restructuring Plan”). As a result of this plan, we will transfer operations located at Hopkins to other North American locations. We believe that by closing the operations at Hopkins we will more effectively utilize our existing North American manufacturing network while reducing operating costs.
Since the inception of the Restructuring Plan we have incurred pre-tax expenses totaling $19.8 million related to these actions, of which $12.1 million was recorded as restructuring expenses and $7.7 million was recorded in cost of revenues, with restructuring expenses of $17.7 million, $0.8 million, and $1.3 million related to the Healthcare, Life Sciences and Isomedix segments, respectively. We do not expect to incur any significant additional restructuring expenses related to this plan. These actions are intended to enhance profitability and improve efficiencies.
The following table summarizes our total pre-tax restructuring expenses for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2015:
Fiscal 2014 Restructuring Plan | |||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Three months ended December 31, (1) | Nine months ended December 31, (2) | |||||
Severance and other compensation related costs | $ | (1,242 | ) | $ | (262 | ) | |
Asset impairment and accelerated depreciation | — | (38 | ) | ||||
Lease termination obligation and other | 133 | 290 | |||||
Product rationalization | 33 | (417 | ) | ||||
Total restructuring expenses | $ | (1,076 | ) | $ | (427 | ) | |
(1) Includes $33 in expense recorded to cost of revenues on Consolidated Statements of Income.
(2) Includes $(417) in expense recorded to cost of revenues on Consolidated Statements of Income.
Pre-tax restructuring expenses of $0.8 million and $0.9 million incurred during the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2014, respectively, related to previously announced restructuring plans.
Liabilities related to restructuring activities are recorded as current liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets within “Accrued payroll and other related liabilities” and “Accrued expenses and other.” The following table summarizes our restructuring liability balances and activity:
29
Fiscal 2014 Restructuring Plan | ||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2015 | ||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | March 31, 2014 | Provision (1) | Payments (1) | December 31, 2014 | ||||||||||||
Severance and termination benefits | $ | 6,389 | $ | (262 | ) | $ | (2,946 | ) | $ | 3,181 | ||||||
Lease termination obligations and other | 1,589 | 18 | (1,236 | ) | 371 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 7,978 | $ | (244 | ) | $ | (4,182 | ) | $ | 3,552 | ||||||
(1) Certain amounts reported include the impact of foreign currency movements relative to the U.S. dollar.
Non-Operating Expenses, Net. Non-operating expenses, net consists of interest expense on debt, offset by interest earned on cash, cash equivalents, short-term investment balances, and other miscellaneous expense. The following table compares our non-operating expenses, net for the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
Three Months Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2014 | 2013 | Change | |||||||||
Non-operating expenses, net: | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | $ | 4,822 | $ | 4,672 | $ | 150 | ||||||
Interest income and miscellaneous expense | (417 | ) | (241 | ) | (176 | ) | ||||||
Non-operating expenses, net | $ | 4,405 | $ | 4,431 | $ | (26 | ) | |||||
Nine Months Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2014 | 2013 | Change | |||||||||
Non-operating expenses, net: | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | $ | 14,452 | $ | 14,527 | $ | (75 | ) | |||||
Interest income and miscellaneous expense | (673 | ) | (715 | ) | 42 | |||||||
Non-operating expenses, net | $ | 13,779 | $ | 13,812 | $ | (33 | ) | |||||
Interest expense for the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2014, essentially remained flat over the prior year periods. Interest income and miscellaneous expense is immaterial.
Income Tax Expense. The following table compares our income tax expense and effective income tax rates for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2014 to the three and nine months ended December 31, 2013:
Three Months Ended December 31, | Change | Percent Change | ||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense | $ | 18,817 | $ | 22,953 | $ | (4,136 | ) | (18.0)% | ||||||
Effective income tax rate | 33.0 | % | 44.6 | % | ||||||||||
Nine Months Ended December 31, | Change | Percent Change | ||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense | $ | 51,493 | $ | 42,824 | $ | 8,669 | 20.2% | |||||||
Effective income tax rate | 35.5 | % | 32.1 | % | ||||||||||
Income tax expense includes United States federal, state and local, and foreign income taxes, and is based on reported pre-tax income. The effective income tax rates for continuing operations for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2014 were 33.0% and 35.5% compared with 44.6% and 32.1% for the same prior year periods. During the third quarter of fiscal 2015, we benefited from the passage of the Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014 and discrete item adjustments. During the first nine months of fiscal 2014, we benefited from the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits due to the settlement of a federal tax examination.
30
We record income tax expense during interim periods based on our estimate of the annual effective income tax rate, adjusted each quarter for discrete items. We analyze various factors to determine the estimated annual effective income tax rate, including projections of our annual earnings and taxing jurisdictions in which the earnings will be generated, the impact of state and local income taxes, our ability to use tax credits and net operating loss carryforwards, and available tax planning alternatives.
Business Segment Results of Operations. We operate in three reportable business segments: Healthcare, Life Sciences, and Isomedix. Corporate and other, which is presented separately, contains the Defense and Industrial business unit plus costs that are associated with being a publicly traded company and certain other corporate costs. These costs include executive office costs, Board of Directors compensation, shareholder services and investor relations, external audit fees, and legacy pension and post-retirement benefit costs. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2014, dated May 29, 2014, provides additional information regarding each business segment. The following table compares business segment revenues for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
(dollars in thousands) | Three Months Ended December 31, | Change | Percent Change | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||||
Healthcare | $ | 353,197 | $ | 291,831 | $ | 61,366 | 21.0 | % | |||||||
Life Sciences | 67,997 | 64,128 | 3,869 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||
Isomedix | 50,960 | 49,157 | 1,803 | 3.7 | % | ||||||||||
Total reportable segments | 472,154 | 405,116 | 67,038 | 16.5 | % | ||||||||||
Corporate and other | 1,090 | 435 | 655 | 150.6 | % | ||||||||||
Total Revenues | $ | 473,244 | $ | 405,551 | $ | 67,693 | 16.7 | % | |||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Nine Months Ended December 31, | Change | Percent Change | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||||
Healthcare | $ | 1,007,176 | $ | 828,051 | $ | 179,125 | 21.6 | % | |||||||
Life Sciences | 185,759 | 182,425 | 3,334 | 1.8 | % | ||||||||||
Isomedix | 154,003 | 144,792 | 9,211 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||
Total reportable segments | 1,346,938 | 1,155,268 | 191,670 | 16.6 | % | ||||||||||
Corporate and other | 1,678 | 1,697 | (19 | ) | (1.1 | )% | |||||||||
Total Revenues | $ | 1,348,616 | $ | 1,156,965 | $ | 191,651 | 16.6 | % | |||||||
Healthcare revenues increased $61.4 million, or 21.0%, to $353.2 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $291.8 million for the same prior year quarter. Healthcare revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2015 increased $179.1 million, or 21.6%, to $1,007.2 million, as compared to $828.1 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2014. These increases are primarily attributable to the fiscal 2015 acquisition of IMS, but also reflect growth in capital equipment, consumable and service revenues. At December 31, 2014, the Healthcare segment’s backlog amounted to $137.8 million, decreasing $18.1 million, or 11.6%, compared to the backlog of $155.9 million at December 31, 2013. This decrease is partially the result of our success in reducing our manufacturing lead times allowing us to fulfill orders on a timelier basis and fluctuation in order timing. Healthcare backlog at December 31, 2014 increased $27.5 million, or 24.9%, compared to the backlog of $110.3 million at March 31, 2014.
Life Sciences revenues increased $3.9 million, or 6.0%, to $68.0 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $64.1 million for the same prior year quarter. This increase is attributable to growth in consumable revenues of 16.2% and service revenues of 3.9%, over the same fiscal 2014 period. Life Science revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2015 increased $3.3 million, or 1.8%, to $185.8 million as compared to $182.4 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2014. This increase is primarily attributable to growth of 12.0% and 5.4% of consumable and service revenues, respectively, which was partially offset by a 10.5% decline in capital equipment revenues over the same fiscal 2014 period. At December 31, 2014, Life Sciences backlog amounted to $43.7 million, decreasing $4.7 million, or 9.7%, compared to the backlog of $48.5 million at December 31, 2013. This decrease is a result of global economic conditions and fluctuations in order timing. Life Sciences backlog at December 31, 2014 decreased by $0.7 million, or 1.5%, compared to the backlog of $44.4 million at March 31, 2014.
31
Isomedix segment revenues increased $1.8 million, or 3.7%, to $51.0 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $49.2 million for the same prior year quarter. Isomedix segment revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2015 increased $9.2 million, or 6.4%, to $154.0 million as compared to $144.8 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2014. Revenues were favorably impacted by increased demand from our core medical device Customers.
The following tables compare our business segment operating results for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2014 to the three and nine months ended December 31, 2013:
Three Months Ended December 31, | Change | Percent Change | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||
Operating income: | |||||||||||||||
Healthcare | $ | 33,843 | $ | 31,238 | $ | 2,605 | 8.3 | % | |||||||
Life Sciences | 16,402 | 12,092 | 4,310 | 35.6 | % | ||||||||||
Isomedix | 12,508 | 14,054 | (1,546 | ) | (11.0 | )% | |||||||||
Total reportable segments | 62,753 | 57,384 | 5,369 | 9.4 | % | ||||||||||
Corporate and other | (1,407 | ) | (1,494 | ) | 87 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||
Total operating income | $ | 61,346 | $ | 55,890 | $ | 5,456 | 9.8 | % | |||||||
Nine Months Ended December 31, | Change | Percent Change | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||
Operating Income: | |||||||||||||||
Healthcare | $ | 81,752 | $ | 72,111 | $ | 9,641 | 13.4 | % | |||||||
Life Sciences | 41,395 | 38,672 | 2,723 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||
Isomedix | 43,098 | 42,484 | 614 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||
Total reportable segments | 166,245 | 153,267 | 12,978 | 8.5 | % | ||||||||||
Corporate and other | (7,308 | ) | (6,065 | ) | (1,243 | ) | (20.5 | )% | |||||||
Total Operating Income | $ | 158,937 | $ | 147,202 | $ | 11,735 | 8.0 | % | |||||||
Segment operating income is calculated as the segment’s gross profit less direct expenses and indirect cost allocations, which results in the full allocation of all distribution and research and development expenses, and the partial allocation of corporate costs. Corporate cost allocations are based on each segment’s percentage of revenues, headcount, or other variables in relation to those of the total company. In addition, the Healthcare segment is responsible for the management of all but one manufacturing facility and uses standard cost to sell products to the Life Sciences segment. Corporate and other includes the revenues, gross profit and direct expenses of the Defense and Industrial business unit, as well as certain unallocated corporate costs related to being a publicly traded company and legacy pension and post-retirement benefits, as previously discussed.
The Healthcare segment’s operating income increased $2.6 million to $33.8 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2015 as compared to $31.2 million in the same prior year period. The Healthcare segment's operating income for the first nine months of fiscal 2015 increased $9.6 million to $81.8 million as compared to $72.1 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2014. The increases in operating income in the fiscal 2015 third quarter and first nine months over the same fiscal 2014 periods was primarily driven by our recent acquisitions, increased volume, favorable foreign currency, and favorable product mix, which was somewhat offset by the Spectrum trade name impairment.
The Life Sciences segment’s operating income increased $4.3 million, or 35.6%, to $16.4 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2015 as compared to $12.1 million for the same prior year period. The Life Sciences business segment's operating income for the first nine months of fiscal 2015 increased by $2.7 million, or 7.0%, to $41.4 million as compared to $38.7 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2014. The segment’s operating margin was 24.1% for the third quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to 18.9% for the third quarter of fiscal 2014. The segment's operating margin was 22.3% for the first nine months of fiscal 2015 compared to 21.2% for the first nine months of fiscal 2014. The increases in operating margins in both the third quarter and the first nine months of fiscal 2015 were primarily attributable to increased volume, favorable product mix and favorable foreign currency, which were partially offset by additional corporate expenses relating to incentive compensation that were allocated to the segment in the fiscal 2015 periods over the same prior year periods.
The Isomedix segment’s operating income decreased $1.5 million, or 11.0%, to $12.5 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2015 as compared to $14.1 million for the same prior year period. The Isomedix segment's operating income for the first nine months of fiscal 2015 increased $0.6 million, or 1.4%, to $43.1 million as compared to $42.5 million in the first nine months of
32
fiscal 2014. The Isomedix operating margin was 24.5% for the third quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to 28.6% in the same prior year period; while the operating margin was 28.0% in the first nine months of fiscal 2015 compared to 29.3% in the first nine months of fiscal 2014. The segment’s operating margin declines in the fiscal 2015 periods were due to higher quality and regulatory expenses and additional corporate expenses relating to incentive compensation that were allocated to the segment in the fiscal 2015 periods over the same prior year periods, which more than offset increased volumes.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table summarizes significant components of our cash flows for the nine months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:
Nine Months Ended December 31, | ||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||
Operating activities: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 93,665 | $ | 90,566 | ||||
Non-cash items | 75,401 | 71,764 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities | (3,856 | ) | (20,157 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 165,210 | $ | 142,173 | ||||
Investing activities: | ||||||||
Purchases of property, plant, equipment, and intangibles, net | $ | (56,757 | ) | $ | (64,778 | ) | ||
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant, equipment, and intangibles | 812 | 4,739 | ||||||
Purchases of investments | (4,681 | ) | — | |||||
Investments in businesses, net of cash acquired | (182,692 | ) | (8,443 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities | $ | (243,318 | ) | $ | (68,482 | ) | ||
Financing activities: | ||||||||
Payments on long-term obligations | $ | — | $ | (70,000 | ) | |||
Deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs | (7,347 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||
Proceeds under credit facilities, net | 117,200 | 52,450 | ||||||
Repurchases of common shares | (20,110 | ) | (23,236 | ) | ||||
Cash dividends paid to common shareholders | (39,790 | ) | (36,009 | ) | ||||
Stock option and other equity transactions, net | 19,245 | 11,877 | ||||||
Tax benefit from share-based compensation | 8,880 | 1,864 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) in financing activities | $ | 78,078 | $ | (63,097 | ) | |||
Debt-to-total capital ratio | 36.2 | % | 32.0 | % | ||||
Free cash flow | $ | 109,265 | $ | 82,134 | ||||
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities – The net cash provided by our operating activities was $165.2 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2015 as compared with $142.2 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2014. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2015 is primarily due to working capital improvements.
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities – The net cash we used in investing activities totaled $243.3 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2015 compared with $68.5 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2014. The following discussion summarizes the significant changes in our investing cash flows for the first nine months of fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014:
• | Purchases of property, plant, equipment, and intangibles, net – Capital expenditures were $56.8 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2015 as compared to $64.8 million during the same prior year period. |
• | Proceeds from the sale of property, plant, equipment, and intangibles – During the third quarter of fiscal 2014, we sold our former Pieterlen, Switzerland manufacturing facility in conjunction with our 2010 restructuring plan. Total proceeds and net loss on the sale were $4.7 million and $0.7 million, respectively. |
• | Purchases of investments– During the third quarter of fiscal 2015, we invested $4.7 million in common stock of Servizi Italia, S.p.A., a leading provider of integrated linen washing and outsourced sterile processing services to hospital Customers. |
• | Investments in businesses, net of cash acquired – During the first nine months of fiscal 2015, we used $173.6 million of cash for the acquisition of IMS and related real estate. We also used $3.3 million of cash for the acquisition of the |
33
assets of AGAPE. For more information on acquisitions refer to note 18 to our consolidated financial statements titled, "Business Acquisitions". During the first quarter of fiscal 2015, we also paid a working capital settlement of $0.8 million and deferred consideration of $5.0 million for the fiscal 2014 acquisition of Eschmann Holdings Ltd. For more information on this acquisition refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2014, dated May 29, 2014. During the third quarter of fiscal 2014, we used $5.8 million in cash for the acquisition of Florida Surgical Repair, Inc. We also used $3.2 million in cash for a deferred purchase price payment related to a fiscal 2012 acquisition.
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities – The net cash provided by financing activities amounted to $78.1 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2015 compared with net cash used in financing activities of $63.1 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2014. The following discussion summarizes the significant changes in our financing cash flows for the first nine months of fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014:
• | Payments on long term obligations- During the second quarter of fiscal 2014, we repaid $30.0 million for the senior notes issued in August 2008, which matured in August 2013. During the third quarter of fiscal 2014, we repaid $40.0 million for the senior notes issued in December 2003, which matured in December 2013. |
• | Deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs- During the third quarter of fiscal 2015, we paid $7.3 million in financing fees and debt issuance costs related to our Bridge Credit Agreement. For more information on this agreement refer to note 19 to our consolidated financial statements titled, "Proposed Acquisition of Synergy Health plc". |
• | Proceeds under credit facilities, net - At December 31, 2014, we had $270.7 million of debt outstanding under our credit facilities, reflecting net borrowings of $117.2 million. At December 31, 2013, we had $134.7 million of debt outstanding under our revolving credit facility, reflecting net borrowings of $52.5 million. |
• | Repurchases of common shares – During the first nine months of fiscal 2015, we obtained 379,695 of our common shares in connection with stock based compensation awards for an aggregate amount of $20.1 million. During the same period in fiscal 2014, we paid for the repurchase of 515,380 of our common shares. We also obtained 43,466 of our common shares during the same period in fiscal 2014, in connection with stock based compensation award programs for an aggregate amount of $23.2 million. |
• | Cash dividends paid to common shareholders – During the first nine months of fiscal 2015, we paid total cash dividends of $39.8 million, or $0.67 per outstanding common share. During the first nine months of fiscal 2014, we paid total cash dividends of $36.0 million, or $0.61 per outstanding common share. |
• | Stock option and other equity transactions, net – We receive cash for issuing common shares under our various employee stock option programs. During the first nine months of fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, we received cash proceeds totaling $19.2 million and $11.9 million, respectively, under these programs. |
• | Tax benefit from share-based compensation – During the first nine months of fiscal 2015, we received a total tax benefit from share based compensation of $8.9 million. During the first nine months of fiscal 2014, we received a total tax benefit from share based compensation of $1.9 million. The increase in the first nine months of fiscal 2015 over the same prior year period was primarily due to an increase in both the quantity and value of restricted shares vesting and stock options exercised. |
Cash Flow Measures. Free cash flow was $109.3 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2015 compared to $82.1 million in the prior year first nine months (see the subsection above titled "Non-GAAP Financial Measures", for additional information and related reconciliation of cash flows from operations to free cash flow). The increase in free cash flow is primarily due to working capital improvements and lower capital spending in fiscal 2015 over fiscal 2014. Our debt-to-total capital ratio was 36.2% at December 31, 2014 and 32.0% at December 31, 2013.
Sources of Credit and Contractual and Commercial Commitments. Information related to our sources of credit and contractual and commercial commitments is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2014, dated May 29, 2014. Our commercial commitments were approximately $52.3 million at December 31, 2014, reflecting a net increase of $2.8 million in surety bonds and other commercial commitments from March 31, 2014. Our outstanding borrowing under our credit facilities was $270.7 million as of December 31, 2014. There were no letters of credit outstanding under the credit facilities at December 31, 2014.
Cash Requirements. We intend to use our existing cash and cash equivalent balances and cash generated from operations for short-term and long-term capital expenditures and our other liquidity needs. In addition, in light of cash needs relating to our proposed recently announced Synergy acquisition (see note 19 to our consolidated financial statements titled, "Proposed Acquisition of Synergy Health plc") and other cash requirements, it will be necessary to replace our existing bank credit facilities with expanded credit facilities, including increased bank and/or additional private placement debt. Our capital requirements depend on many uncertain factors, including our rate of sales growth, our Customers’ acceptance of our products and services, the costs of obtaining adequate manufacturing capacities, the timing and extent of our research and development
34
projects, changes in our operating expenses and other factors. To the extent that existing and anticipated sources of cash are not sufficient to fund our future activities, we may need to raise additional funds through additional borrowings or the sale of equity securities. We have a short-term Bridge Facility available to us should the referenced acquisition close without or with insufficient permanent financing in place. But regardless of whether the acquisition closes, we may need to obtain expanded permanent credit availability, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain all the additional funds needed on terms favorable to us, or at all.
Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates, and Assumptions
Information related to our critical accounting policies, estimates, and assumptions is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2014, dated May 29, 2014. Our critical accounting policies, estimates, and assumptions have not changed materially from March 31, 2014.
Contingencies
We are, and will likely continue to be, involved in a number of legal proceedings, government investigations, and claims, which we believe generally arise in the course of our business, given our size, history, complexity, and the nature of our business, products, Customers, regulatory environment, and industries in which we participate. These legal proceedings, investigations and claims generally involve a variety of legal theories and allegations, including, without limitation, personal injury (e.g., slip and falls, burns, vehicle accidents), product liability or regulation (e.g., based on product operation or claimed malfunction, failure to warn, failure to meet specification, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements), product exposure (e.g., claimed exposure to chemicals, asbestos, contaminants, radiation), property damage (e.g., claimed damage due to leaking equipment, fire, vehicles, chemicals), commercial claims (e.g., breach of contract, economic loss, warranty, misrepresentation), financial (e.g., taxes, reporting), employment (e.g., wrongful termination, discrimination, benefits matters), and other claims for damage and relief.
We record a liability for such contingencies to the extent we conclude that their occurrence is both probable and estimable. We consider many factors in making these assessments, including the professional judgment of experienced members of management and our legal counsel. We have made estimates as to the likelihood of unfavorable outcomes and the amounts of such potential losses. In our opinion, the ultimate outcome of these proceedings and claims is not anticipated to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. However, the ultimate outcome of proceedings, government investigations, and claims is unpredictable and actual results could be materially different from our estimates. We record expected recoveries under applicable insurance contracts when we are assured of recovery. Refer to Part II, Item 1, “Legal Proceedings” for additional information.
We are subject to taxation from United States federal, state and local, and foreign jurisdictions. Tax positions are settled primarily through the completion of audits within each individual tax jurisdiction or the closing of a statute of limitation. Changes in applicable tax law or other events may also require us to revise past estimates. The IRS routinely conducts audits of our federal income tax returns. We are no longer subject to United States federal examinations for years before fiscal 2014 and, with limited exceptions, we are no longer subject to United States state and local or non-United States income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before fiscal 2010. We remain subject to tax authority audits in various other jurisdictions in which we operate. If we prevail in matters for which accruals have been recorded, or are required to pay amounts in excess of recorded accruals, our effective income tax rate in a given financial statement period could be materially impacted.
Additional information regarding our commitments and contingencies is included in note 9 to our consolidated financial statements titled, “Commitments and Contingencies.”
International Operations
International Operations. Since we conduct operations outside of the United States using various foreign currencies, our operating results are impacted by foreign currency movements relative to the U.S. dollar. During the third quarter of fiscal 2015, our revenues were unfavorably impacted by $3.9 million, or 0.8%, and income before taxes was favorably impacted by $3.4 million, or 6.3%, as a result of foreign currency movements relative to the U.S. dollar. During the first nine months of fiscal 2015, our revenues were unfavorably impacted by $2.2 million, or 0.2%, and income before taxes was favorably impacted by $5.4 million, or 3.8%, as a result of foreign currency movements relative to the U.S. dollar.
Forward-Looking Statements
35
This Form 10-Q may contain statements concerning certain trends, expectations, forecasts, estimates, or other forward-looking information affecting or relating to Synergy Health plc (“Synergy”) or STERIS or its industry, products or activities that are intended to qualify for the protections afforded "forward-looking statements" under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other laws and regulations. Forward-looking statements speak only as to the date of this report, and may be identified by the use of forward-looking terms such as "may," "will," "expects," "believes," "anticipates," "plans," "estimates," "projects," "targets," "forecasts," "outlook," "impact," "potential," "confidence," "improve," "optimistic," "deliver," "comfortable," "trend", and "seeks," or the negative of such terms or other variations on such terms or comparable terminology. Many important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements including, without limitation, disruption of production or supplies, changes in market conditions, political events, pending or future claims or litigation, competitive factors, technology advances, actions of regulatory agencies, and changes in laws, government regulations, labeling or product approvals or the application or interpretation thereof. Other risk factors are described herein and in STERIS and Synergy's other securities filings, including Item 1A of STERIS's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2014 dated May 29, 2014 and in Synergy's annual report and accounts for the year ended 30 March 2014 (section headed "principal risks and uncertainties"). Many of these important factors are outside STERIS's or Synergy's control. No assurances can be provided as to any result or the timing of any outcome regarding matters described herein or otherwise with respect to any regulatory action, administrative proceedings, government investigations, litigation, warning letters, consent decree, cost reductions, business strategies, earnings or revenue trends or future financial results. References to products and the consent decree are summaries only and should not be considered the specific terms of the decree or product clearance or literature. Unless legally required, STERIS and Synergy do not undertake to update or revise any forward-looking statements even if events make clear that any projected results, express or implied, will not be realized. Other potential risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, without limitation, (a) the potential for increased pressure on pricing or costs that leads to erosion of profit margins, (b) the possibility that market demand will not develop for new technologies, products or applications or services, or business initiatives will take longer, cost more or produce lower benefits than anticipated, (c) the possibility that application of or compliance with laws, court rulings, certifications, regulations, regulatory actions, including without limitation those relating to FDA warning notices or letters, government investigations, the outcome of any pending FDA requests, inspections or submissions, or other requirements or standards may delay, limit or prevent new product introductions, affect the production and marketing of existing products or services or otherwise affect Company performance, results, prospects or value, (d) the potential of international unrest, economic downturn or effects of currencies, tax assessments, adjustments or anticipated rates, raw material costs or availability, benefit or retirement plan costs, or other regulatory compliance costs, (e) the possibility of reduced demand, or reductions in the rate of growth in demand, for products and services, (f) the possibility that anticipated growth, cost savings, new product acceptance, performance or approvals, or other results may not be achieved, or that transition, labor, competition, timing, execution, regulatory, governmental, or other issues or risks associated with STERIS and Synergy's businesses, industry or initiatives including, without limitation, the consent decree or those matters described in STERIS's Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2014 and other securities filings, may adversely impact Company performance, results, prospects or value, (g) the possibility that anticipated financial results or benefits of recent acquisitions, or of STERIS's restructuring efforts will not be realized or will be other than anticipated, (h) the effects of the contractions in credit availability, as well as the ability of STERIS and Synergy's Customers and suppliers to adequately access the credit markets when needed, (i) the receipt of approval of both STERIS's shareholders and Synergy's shareholders for the proposed transaction with Synergy (the “Synergy transaction”), (j) the regulatory approvals required for the Synergy transaction not being obtained on the terms expected or on the anticipated schedule, (k) the parties’ ability to meet expectations regarding the timing, completion and accounting and tax treatments of the Synergy transaction, (l) the possibility that the parties may be unable to achieve expected synergies and operating efficiencies in connection with the Synergy transaction within the expected time-frames or at all and to successfully integrate Synergy’s operations into those of STERIS, (m) the integration of Synergy’s operations into those of STERIS being more difficult, time-consuming or costly than expected, (n) operating costs, Customer loss and business disruption (including, without limitations, difficulties in maintaining relationships with employees, Customers, clients or suppliers) being greater than expected following the Synergy transaction, (o) the retention of certain key employees of Synergy being difficult, (p) changes in tax laws or interpretations that could increase the consolidated tax liabilities of Synergy and STERIS, including, if the transaction is consummated, changes in tax laws that would result in the new parent UK holding company being treated as a domestic corporation for United States federal tax purposes, and (q) those risks described in STERIS's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2014, and other securities filings.
Disclosure Requirements Relating to the Acquisition of Synergy Health plc of the U.K. Takeover Code (the "Code")
Under Rule 8.3(a) of the Code, any person who is interested in 1% or more of any class of relevant securities of an offeree company or of any securities exchange offeror (being any offeror other than an offeror in respect of which it has been announced that its offer is, or is likely to be, solely in cash) must make an Opening Position Disclosure following the commencement of the offer period and, if later, following the announcement in which any securities exchange offeror is first
36
identified. An Opening Position Disclosure must contain details of the person’s interests and short positions in, and rights to subscribe for, any relevant securities of each of (i) the offeree company and (ii) any securities exchange offeror(s). An Opening Position Disclosure by a person to whom Rule 8.3(a) applies must be made by no later than 3.30 pm (London time) on the 10th business day following the commencement of the offer period and, if appropriate, by no later than 3.30 pm (London time) on the 10th business day following the announcement in which any securities exchange offeror is first identified. Relevant persons who deal in the relevant securities of the offeree company or of a securities exchange offeror prior to the deadline for making an Opening Position Disclosure must instead make a Dealing Disclosure.
Under Rule 8.3(b) of the Code, any person who is, or becomes, interested in 1% or more of any class of relevant securities of the offeree company or of any securities exchange offeror must make a Dealing Disclosure if the person deals in any relevant securities of the offeree company or of any securities exchange offeror. A Dealing Disclosure must contain details of the dealing concerned and of the person’s interests and short positions in, and rights to subscribe for, any relevant securities of each of (i) the offeree company and (ii) any securities exchange offeror, save to the extent that these details have previously been disclosed under Rule 8. A Dealing Disclosure by a person to whom Rule 8.3(b) applies must be made by no later than 3.30 pm (London time) on the business day following the date of the relevant dealing.
If two or more persons act together pursuant to an agreement or understanding, whether formal or informal, to acquire or control an interest in relevant securities of an offeree company or a securities exchange offeror, they will be deemed to be a single person for the purpose of Rule 8.3.
Opening Position Disclosures must also be made by the offeree company and by any offeror and Dealing Disclosures must also be made by the offeree company, by any offeror and by any persons acting in concert with any of them (see Rules 8.1, 8.2 and 8.4).
Details of the offeree and offeror companies in respect of whose relevant securities Opening Position Disclosures and Dealing Disclosures must be made can be found in the Disclosure Table on the Takeover Panel’s website at www.thetakeoverpanel.org.uk, including details of the number of relevant securities in issue, when the offer period commenced and when any offeror was first identified. You should contact the Panel’s Market Surveillance Unit on +44 (0)20 7638 0129 if you are in any doubt as to whether you are required to make an Opening Position Disclosure or a Dealing Disclosure.
Availability of Securities and Exchange Commission Filings
We make available free of charge on or through our website our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we file such material with, or furnish such material to, the Securities Exchange Commission ("SEC.") You may access these documents on the Investor Relations page of our website at http://www.steris-ir.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this report. You may also obtain copies of these documents by visiting the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549, or by accessing the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. You may obtain information on the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
In the ordinary course of business, we are subject to interest rate, foreign currency, and commodity risks. Information related to these risks and our management of these exposures is included in Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2014, dated May 29, 2014. Our exposures to market risks have not changed materially since March 31, 2014.
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Under the supervision of and with the participation of our management, including the Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”) and Principal Financial Officer (“PFO”), we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report. Based on that evaluation, including the assessment and input of our management, the PEO and PFO concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
37
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
38
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are, and will likely continue to be, involved in a number of legal proceedings, government investigations, and claims, which we believe generally arise in the course of our business, given our size, history, complexity, and the nature of our business, products, Customers, regulatory environment, and industries in which we participate. These legal proceedings, investigations and claims generally involve a variety of legal theories and allegations, including, without limitation, personal injury (e.g., slip and falls, burns, vehicle accidents), product liability or regulation (e.g., based on product operation or claimed malfunction, failure to warn, failure to meet specification, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements), product exposure (e.g., claimed exposure to chemicals, asbestos, contaminants, radiation), property damage (e.g., claimed damage due to leaking equipment, fire, vehicles, chemicals), commercial claims (e.g., breach of contract, economic loss, warranty, misrepresentation), financial (e.g., taxes, reporting), employment (e.g., wrongful termination, discrimination, benefits matters), and other claims for damage and relief.
We believe we have adequately reserved for our current litigation and claims that are probable and estimable, and further believe that the ultimate outcome of these pending lawsuits and claims will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations taken as a whole. Due to their inherent uncertainty, however, there can be no assurance of the ultimate outcome or effect of current or future litigation, investigations, claims or other proceedings (including without limitation the FDA-related matters discussed below). For certain types of claims, we presently maintain insurance coverage for personal injury and property damage and other liability coverages in amounts and with deductibles that we believe are prudent, but there can be no assurance that these coverages will be applicable or adequate to cover adverse outcomes of claims or legal proceedings against us.
In April 2010, after ongoing discussions with the FDA regarding a 2008 warning letter relating to our SYSTEM 1® sterile processor and related sterilant, we reached agreement with the FDA on the terms of a consent decree (“Consent Decree”). The Consent Decree was approved the same month by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. In general, among other matters, the Consent Decree restricts further sales of SYSTEM 1 processors in the U.S., prohibits the sale of liquid chemical sterilization or disinfection products in the U.S. that do not have FDA clearance, describes various process and compliance matters, and defines penalties in the event of violation of the Consent Decree.
On May 31, 2012, our Albert Browne Limited subsidiary received a warning letter from the FDA regarding chemical indicators manufactured in the United Kingdom. These devices are intended for the monitoring of certain sterilization and other processes. The FDA warning letter states that the agency has concerns regarding operational business processes. We do not believe that the FDA's concerns are related to product performance, or that they result from Customer complaints. We have reviewed our processes with the agency and finalized our remediation measures, and are awaiting FDA reinspection. We do not currently believe that the impact of this event will have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
On May 23, 2014, the Company received a warning letter from the FDA regarding an inspection that the FDA concluded on January 8, 2014 at our STERIS Isomedix Services facility located in Libertyville, Illinois. The facility primarily provides microbial reduction services for certain medical device Customers. Among other matters, the FDA warning letter asserts that certain processes and procedures observed during the inspection did not conform to current Good Manufacturing Practices for medical devices as required by Title 21 CFR Part 820 and, as a result, that certain devices processed at the subject facility are adulterated within the meaning of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Since the inspection, the Company has provided detailed responses to the FDA regarding its corrective actions, and has continued to work diligently to remediate the FDA’s concerns. We do not believe that this inspection was a result of Customer complaints and there have been no reports of patient injury. We do not expect this situation to have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial condition.
Other civil, criminal, regulatory or other proceedings involving our products or services could possibly result in judgments, settlements or administrative or judicial decrees requiring us, among other actions, to pay damages or fines or effect recalls, or be subject to other governmental, Customer or other third party claims or remedies, which could materially affect our business, performance, prospects, value, financial condition, and results of operations.
For additional information regarding these matters, see the following portions of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014: “Business - Information with respect to our Business in General - Government Regulation”, and the “Risk Factor” titled: “We may be adversely affected by product liability claims or other legal actions or regulatory or compliance matters, including the Consent Decree” and the “Risk Factor” titled “Compliance with the Consent Decree may be more costly and burdensome than anticipated.
From time to time, STERIS is also involved in legal proceedings as a plaintiff involving contract, patent protection, and other claims asserted by us. Gains, if any, from these proceedings are recognized when they are realized.
39
On December 19, 2014, a stockholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the Court of Common Pleas, Cuyahoga County, Ohio, against the members of STERIS’s board of directors and its named executive officers, challenging the “excise tax make-whole payments” approved by STERIS’s board in connection with the proposed Synergy transaction. STERIS is named as a nominal defendant in the action. These payments are in respect of an excise tax that will be imposed, by virtue of the transaction, solely on the value of any outstanding stock compensation held by STERIS board members and executive officers, and are intended to place these individuals in the same excise tax-neutral position with respect to their STERIS equity awards after the transaction as before. The case is captioned St. Lucie County Fire District Firefighters’ Pension Trust Fund v. Rosebrough, Jr., et al., Case No. CV 14 837749. The complaint generally alleges that STERIS’s board breached their fiduciary duties by approving the excise tax make-whole payments, that the payments constitute corporate waste and that the payments are voidable under Ohio law. The complaint seeks among other things a declaration that the excise tax make-whole payments are invalid, damages, disgorgement of any excise tax make-whole payments and plaintiffs’ costs and disbursements in the action, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, expert fees, costs and expenses.
Additional information regarding our contingencies is included in Item 7 of Part II, titled “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2014, dated May 29, 2014, and in this Form 10-Q in note 9 to our consolidated financial statements titled "Commitments and Contingencies."
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
For a complete discussion of the Company's risk factors, you should carefully review the risk factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014, dated May 29, 2014, and the following risk factors relating to the proposed Synergy transaction (which we also refer to as the “Combination”). Additional Synergy transaction-related risk factors are set forth in the Company’s Proxy Statement relating to the special meeting of shareholders scheduled for March 12, 2015, filed February 9, 2015 (the “Proxy Statement”).
Risks Relating to the Combination
STERIS must obtain required approvals and governmental and regulatory consents to consummate the Combination, which, if delayed, not granted or granted with unacceptable conditions, may delay or jeopardize the completion of the Combination, result in additional expenditures of money and resources and/or reduce the anticipated benefits of the Combination. Consummation of the Combination is also conditioned on the approval by STERIS shareholders, Synergy shareholders and the approval of the High Court of Justice in England and Wales (the “Court”).
The completion of the Combination is conditioned on, among other things, the clearance by antitrust and competition authorities in the United States. The responsible governmental authorities have broad discretion in administering the governing regulations. STERIS can provide no assurance that all required approvals and consents will be obtained. Moreover, as a condition to their approval of the Combination, agencies may impose requirements, limitations or costs or require divestitures or place restrictions on the conduct of the business of New STERIS Limited ("New STERIS") (which, if the Combination is completed, will become the parent company of STERIS and of which current STERIS shareholders will become shareholders, after the closing). These requirements, limitations, costs, divestitures or restrictions could jeopardize or delay the completion of the Combination or reduce the anticipated benefits of the Combination. Further, no assurance can be given that the required shareholder approvals will be obtained or that the required closing conditions will be satisfied, and, if all required consents and approvals are obtained and the closing conditions are satisfied, no assurance can be given as to the terms, conditions and timing of the approvals. If STERIS and Synergy agree to any material requirements, limitations, costs, divestitures or restrictions in order to obtain any approvals required to consummate the Combination, these requirements, limitations, costs, divestitures or restrictions could adversely affect New STERIS’s ability to integrate Synergy’s operations with STERIS’s operations and/or reduce the anticipated benefits of the Combination. This could have a material adverse effect on New STERIS’s business and results of operations.
The Combination remains subject to other conditions that STERIS cannot control.
The Combination is subject to other conditions, including the approval of the scheme of arrangement proposed to be made under Part 26 of the Companies Act between Synergy and the Synergy shareholders (the “Scheme”), with or subject to any modification, addition or condition approved or imposed by the Synergy shareholders, the sanction of the Scheme by the Court, the adoption of a proposed merger agreement by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding STERIS shares, the Scheme becoming effective by April 13, 2015 (or such later date (if any) as may be agreed by STERIS and Synergy and (if required) the consent of the U.K. Panel on Takeovers and Mergers (the “Takeover Panel”) and the Court), the
40
Registration Statement on Form S-4 not having been the subject of any stop order suspending its effectiveness and no proceedings seeking any such stop order having been initiated or threatened by the SEC, and the NYSE having authorized the listing of the New STERIS ordinary shares upon official notice of issuance and not having withdrawn such authorization. Additional conditions are set out in Appendix 2 to the Rule 2.7 Announcement entitled “Conditions to and Certain Further Terms of the Combination,” which is attached as Annex B to the Proxy Statement. No assurance can be given that all of the conditions to the Combination will be satisfied, or if they are, as to the timing of such satisfaction. If the conditions to the Combination are not satisfied, then the Combination may not be consummated.
While the Combination is pending, STERIS will be subject to business uncertainties that could adversely affect its business.
Uncertainty about the effect of the Combination on employees, Customers and suppliers may have an adverse effect on STERIS and, consequently, on New STERIS. These uncertainties may impair STERIS’s ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel until the Combination is consummated and for a period of time thereafter, and could cause Customers, suppliers and others who deal with STERIS to seek to change existing business relationships with STERIS. Employee retention may be particularly challenging during the pendency of the Combination because employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles with New STERIS. If, despite STERIS’s retention efforts, key employees depart because of issues relating to the uncertainty and difficulty of integration or a desire not to remain with New STERIS, New STERIS’s business could be harmed.
In certain circumstances STERIS may not be able to invoke the transaction conditions and terminate the Combination, which could reduce the value of New STERIS shares.
The Takeover Code provides that certain conditions may only be invoked where the circumstances underlying the failure of the condition are of material significance to STERIS in the context of the Combination. Therefore, with the exceptions of certain antitrust conditions as described in the section of this proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Regulatory Approvals” and certain conditions relating to (i) the approval of the Scheme by Synergy shareholders and the Court, (ii) the approval of the Merger Agreement by STERIS shareholders and (iii) the listing of New STERIS ordinary shares on the NYSE, STERIS may be required to obtain agreement of the Takeover Panel that the circumstances giving rise to the right to invoke the condition were of material significance to STERIS in the context of the Combination before STERIS would be permitted to rely on that condition.
If a material adverse change affecting Synergy occurs and the Takeover Panel does not allow STERIS to invoke a condition to cause the Combination not to proceed, the market price of STERIS shares may decline or STERIS’s business or STERIS’s financial condition may be materially adversely affected. As a result, the value of the New STERIS ordinary shares received by STERIS shareholders may be reduced and/or the business or financial condition of New STERIS may be adversely affected.
The Takeover Code may limit STERIS’s ability to cause Synergy to consummate the transaction and may otherwise limit the relief STERIS may obtain in the event Synergy’s board withdraws its support of the Scheme.
The Takeover Code limits the contractual commitments that may be obtained from Synergy to take actions in furtherance of the Combination, and the Synergy Board may, if its fiduciary and other directors’ duties so require, withdraw its recommendation in support for the Scheme, and withdraw the Scheme itself, at any time before the Court hearing to approve the reduction of Synergy’s share capital provided for as part of the Scheme. The Takeover Code does not permit Synergy to pay any break fee if it does so, nor can it be subject to any restrictions on soliciting or negotiating other offers or transactions involving Synergy other than the restrictions against undertaking actions or entering into agreements which are similar to or have a similar effect to “poison pills” and which might frustrate STERIS’s offer for Synergy.
STERIS shareholders will have a reduced ownership and voting interest after the Combination and may exercise less influence over management in New STERIS than they currently have in STERIS.
Upon the completion of the Combination, a STERIS shareholder will hold a percentage ownership of New STERIS that is smaller than such shareholder’s current percentage ownership of STERIS as it exists today. It is currently expected that the former shareholders of STERIS as a group will receive shares in the Combination constituting approximately 70% of the outstanding New STERIS ordinary shares immediately after the consummation of the Combination. Because of this, current STERIS shareholders may have less influence on the management and policies of New STERIS than they currently have on the management and policies of STERIS.
ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
41
During the third quarter of fiscal 2015, we obtained 242,512 of our common shares in connection with stock based compensation award programs. We did not repurchase any of our shares during the third quarter of fiscal 2015. When we do make repurchases, they are made pursuant to a single repurchase program which was approved by our Board of Directors and announced on March 14, 2008, authorizing the repurchase of up to $300.0 million of our common shares. As of December 31, 2014, $86.9 million in common shares remained authorized for repurchase under this authorization. This common share repurchase authorization does not have a stated maturity date. The following table summarizes the common shares repurchase activity during the third quarter of fiscal 2015 under our common share repurchase program:
(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased | (b) Average Price Paid Per Share | (c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans | (d) Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans at Period End (dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
October 1-31 | — | $ | — | — | $ | 86,939 | ||||||||
November 1-30 | — | — | — | 86,939 | ||||||||||
December 1-31 | — | — | — | 86,939 | ||||||||||
Total | — | (1) | $ | — | (1) | — | $ | 86,939 | ||||||
(1) | Does not include 10 shares purchased during the quarter at an average price of $61.52 per share by the STERIS Corporation 401(k) Plan on behalf of certain executive officers of the Company who may be deemed to be affiliated purchasers. |
42
ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS |
Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K
Exhibit Number | Exhibit Description |
2.1 | Rule 2.7 Announcement, dated as of October 13, 2014 (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed October 14, 2014 (Commission File No. 1-14643), and incorporated herein by reference). |
2.2 | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 13, 2014, by and among STERIS Corporation, Solar New Holdco Limited, Solar U.S. Holding Co., Solar US Parent Co., and Solar US Merger Sub Inc. (filed as Exhibit 2.2 to Form 8-K filed October 14, 2014 (Commission File No. 1-14643), and incorporated herein by reference). |
3.1 | 1992 Amended Articles of Incorporation of STERIS Corporation, as amended on May 14, 1996, November 6, 1996, and August 6, 1998 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-K filed for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2000 (Commission File No. 1-14643), and incorporated herein by reference). |
3.2 | Amended and Restated Regulations of STERIS Corporation, as amended on July 26, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007 (Commission File No. 1-14643), and incorporated herein by reference). |
4.1 | Specimen Form of Common Stock Certificate (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Form 10-K filed for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002 (Commission File No. 1-14643), and incorporated herein by reference). |
10.1 | 364-Day Bridge Credit Agreement, dated as of October 13, 2014, among Solar US Parent Co., as Borrower, STERIS Corporation, as Guarantor, Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent and lender and the other lenders party thereto (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed October 14, 2014 (Commission File No. 1-14643), and incorporated herein by reference). |
10.2 | Amendment No. 2, dated as of October 7, 2014, to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of April 13, 2012, by and among STERIS Corporation, the lenders from time to time party thereto and KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed October 14, 2014 (Commission File No. 1-14643), and incorporated herein by reference). |
15.1 | Letter Re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information. |
31.1 | Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 | Certification of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1 | Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
EX-101 | Instance Document. |
EX-101 | Schema Document. |
EX-101 | Calculation Linkbase Document. |
EX-101 | Definition Linkbase Document. |
EX-101 | Labels Linkbase Document. |
EX-101 | Presentation Linkbase Document. |
43
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
STERIS Corporation |
/S/ MICHAEL J. TOKICH |
Michael J. Tokich Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
February 9, 2015 |
44
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number | Exhibit Description |
2.1 | Rule 2.7 Announcement, dated as of October 13, 2014 (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed October 14, 2014 (Commission File No. 1-14643), and incorporated herein by reference). |
2.2 | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 13, 2014, by and among STERIS Corporation, Solar New Holdco Limited, Solar U.S. Holding Co., Solar US Parent Co., and Solar US Merger Sub Inc. (filed as Exhibit 2.2 to Form 8-K filed October 14, 2014 (Commission File No. 1-14643), and incorporated herein by reference). |
3.1 | 1992 Amended Articles of Incorporation of STERIS Corporation, as amended on May 14, 1996, November 6, 1996, and August 6, 1998 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-K filed for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2000 (Commission File No. 1-14643), and incorporated herein by reference). |
3.2 | Amended and Restated Regulations of STERIS Corporation, as amended on July 26, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007 (Commission File No. 1-14643), and incorporated herein by reference). |
4.1 | Specimen Form of Common Stock Certificate (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Form 10-K filed for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002 (Commission File No. 1-14643), and incorporated herein by reference). |
10.1 | 364-Day Bridge Credit Agreement, dated as of October 13, 2014, among Solar US Parent Co., as Borrower, STERIS Corporation, as Guarantor, Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent and lender and the other lenders party thereto (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed October 14, 2014 (Commission File No. 1-14643), and incorporated herein by reference). |
10.2 | Amendment No. 2, dated as of October 7, 2014, to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of April 13, 2012, by and among STERIS Corporation, the lenders from time to time party thereto and KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed October 14, 2014 (Commission File No. 1-14643), and incorporated herein by reference). |
15.1 | Letter Re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information. |
31.1 | Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 | Certification of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1 | Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
EX-101 | Instance Document. |
EX-101 | Schema Document. |
EX-101 | Calculation Linkbase Document. |
EX-101 | Definition Linkbase Document. |
EX-101 | Labels Linkbase Document. |
EX-101 | Presentation Linkbase Document. |
45
Exhibit 15.1
LETTER REGARDING UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Board of Directors and Shareholders
STERIS Corporation
We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the following STERIS Corporation Registration Statements of our review report, dated February 9, 2015, relating to the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of STERIS Corporation and subsidiaries, included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2014:
Registration Number | Description |
333-32005 | Form S-8 Registration Statement - STERIS Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan |
33-55976 | Form S-8 Registration Statement - STERIS Corporation 401(k) Plan |
333-09733 | Form S-8 Registration Statement - STERIS Corporation 401(k) Plan |
333-101308 | Form S-8 Registration Statement - STERIS Corporation 2002 Stock Option Plan |
333-137167 | Form S-8 Registration Statement - STERIS Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan |
333-136239 | Form S-8 Registration Statement - STERIS Corporation 2006 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan |
333-170884 | Form S-8 Registration Statement - STERIS Corporation 401(k) Plan |
333-176167 | Form S-8 Registration Statement - STERIS Corporation 2006 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (as Amended and Restated Effective July 28, 2011) |
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
February 9, 2015
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Walter M Rosebrough, Jr., certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of STERIS Corporation; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: | February 9, 2015 |
/S/ WALTER M ROSEBROUGH, JR. | |
Walter M Rosebrough, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer | |
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
I, Michael J. Tokich, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of STERIS Corporation; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: | February 9, 2015 |
/S/ MICHAEL J. TOKICH | |
Michael J. Tokich Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | |
Exhibit 32.1
Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Form 10-Q of STERIS Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, that, to such officer's knowledge:
(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. |
/S/ WALTER M ROSEBROUGH, JR. | ||
Name: | Walter M Rosebrough, Jr. | |
Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer | |
/S/ MICHAEL J. TOKICH | ||
Name: | Michael J. Tokich | |
Title: | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | |
Dated: February 9, 2015